From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:43:22 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: i2c: rename address check functions
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=66be6056eba80690bb7fa3d983c21494e1950bea;p=linux-beck.git

i2c: rename address check functions

The current naming is based on the arguments of the functions and not on
what they do. Even I as the maintainer find this confusing, so let's
rename them to something more descriptive.

Tested-by: Andrey Danin <danindrey@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
---

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index 47dbe2514741..fced494040a8 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static unsigned short i2c_encode_flags_to_addr(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 /* This is a permissive address validity check, I2C address map constraints
  * are purposely not enforced, except for the general call address. */
-static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client)
+static int i2c_check_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN) {
 		/* 10-bit address, all values are valid */
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client)
  * device uses a reserved address, then it shouldn't be probed. 7-bit
  * addressing is assumed, 10-bit address devices are rare and should be
  * explicitly enumerated. */
-static int i2c_check_addr_validity(unsigned short addr)
+static int i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(unsigned short addr)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Reserved addresses per I2C specification:
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info)
 	strlcpy(client->name, info->type, sizeof(client->name));
 
 	/* Check for address validity */
-	status = i2c_check_client_addr_validity(client);
+	status = i2c_check_addr_validity(client);
 	if (status) {
 		dev_err(&adap->dev, "Invalid %d-bit I2C address 0x%02hx\n",
 			client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN ? 10 : 7, client->addr);
@@ -2296,7 +2296,7 @@ static int i2c_detect_address(struct i2c_client *temp_client,
 	int err;
 
 	/* Make sure the address is valid */
-	err = i2c_check_addr_validity(addr);
+	err = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr);
 	if (err) {
 		dev_warn(&adapter->dev, "Invalid probe address 0x%02x\n",
 			 addr);
@@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ i2c_new_probed_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 
 	for (i = 0; addr_list[i] != I2C_CLIENT_END; i++) {
 		/* Check address validity */
-		if (i2c_check_addr_validity(addr_list[i]) < 0) {
+		if (i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr_list[i]) < 0) {
 			dev_warn(&adap->dev, "Invalid 7-bit address "
 				 "0x%02x\n", addr_list[i]);
 			continue;
@@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ int i2c_slave_register(struct i2c_client *client, i2c_slave_cb_t slave_cb)
 
 	if (!(client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN)) {
 		/* Enforce stricter address checking */
-		ret = i2c_check_addr_validity(client->addr);
+		ret = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(client->addr);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: invalid address\n", __func__);
 			return ret;