From: Paulo Zanoni Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:47:24 +0000 (-0200) Subject: drm/i915: do not assert DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB enabled X-Git-Tag: next-20131212~49^2~19 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6806e63f48f819754f39e1f796e790b377fb6a89;p=karo-tx-linux.git drm/i915: do not assert DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB enabled The current code was checking if all bits of "val" were enabled and DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB was disabled. The new code doesn't care about the state of DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB: it just checks if everything else is 1. The goal is that future patches may completely disable interrupts, and the LCPLL-disabling code shouldn't care about the state of DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi [danvet: I think the commit message is actually wrong in it's description of what the old test checked, but the new one seems sane. So meh.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 895759b5569f..d3a3fba64361 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -6514,7 +6514,7 @@ static void assert_can_disable_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags); val = I915_READ(DEIMR); - WARN((val & ~DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB) != val, + WARN((val | DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB) != 0xffffffff, "Unexpected DEIMR bits enabled: 0x%x\n", val); val = I915_READ(SDEIMR); WARN((val | SDE_HOTPLUG_MASK_CPT) != 0xffffffff,