From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:51:27 +0000 (+0200) Subject: block: remove BKL from BLKROSET and BLKFLSBUF X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6de43703108bb1d3fc9495b3e8107d6ec72f97e4;p=linux-beck.git block: remove BKL from BLKROSET and BLKFLSBUF We only call the functions set_device_ro(), invalidate_bdev(), sync_filesystem() and sync_blockdev() while holding the BKL in these commands. All of these are also done in other code paths without the BKL, which leads me to the conclusion that the BKL is not needed here either. The reason we hold it here is that it was originally pushed down into the ioctl function from vfs_ioctl. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c index 9d91e830b320..60f477c91eef 100644 --- a/block/ioctl.c +++ b/block/ioctl.c @@ -197,10 +197,8 @@ int blkdev_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, unsigned cmd, if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != -ENOTTY) return ret; - lock_kernel(); fsync_bdev(bdev); invalidate_bdev(bdev); - unlock_kernel(); return 0; case BLKROSET: @@ -212,9 +210,7 @@ int blkdev_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, unsigned cmd, return -EACCES; if (get_user(n, (int __user *)(arg))) return -EFAULT; - lock_kernel(); set_device_ro(bdev, n); - unlock_kernel(); return 0; case BLKDISCARD: {