From: Wey-Yi Guy Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:17:04 +0000 (-0800) Subject: iwlwifi: Use RTS/CTS as the preferred protection mechanism for 6000 series X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=73871f7181a1406c67e93c8c83f5edb26057a2a6;p=linux-beck.git iwlwifi: Use RTS/CTS as the preferred protection mechanism for 6000 series When 802.11g was introduced, we had RTS/CTS and CTS-to-Self protection mechanisms. In an HT Beacon, HT stations use the "Operating Mode" field in the HT Information Element to determine whether or not to use protection. The Operating Mode field has 4 possible settings: 0-3: Mode 0: If all stations in the BSS are 20/40 MHz HT capable, or if the BSS is 20/40 MHz capable, or if all stations in the BSS are 20 MHz HT stations in a 20 MHz BSS Mode 1: used if there are non-HT stations or APs using the primary or secondary channels Mode 2: if only HT stations are associated in the BSS and at least one 20 MHz HT station is associated. Mode 3: used if one or more non-HT stations are associated in the BSS. When in operating modes 1 or 3, and the Use_Protection field is 1 in the Beacon's ERP IE, all HT transmissions must be protected using RTS/CTS or CTS-to-Self. By default, CTS-to-self is the preferred protection mechanism for less overhead and higher throughput; but using the full RTS/CTS will better protect the inner exchange from interference, especially in highly-congested environment. For 6000 series WIFI NIC, RTS/CTS protection mechanism is the recommended choice for HT traffic based on the HW design. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c index c295b8ee9228..1473452ba22f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6000h_2agn_cfg = { .max_ll_items = OTP_MAX_LL_ITEMS_6x00, .shadow_ram_support = true, .ht_greenfield_support = true, + .use_rts_for_ht = true, /* use rts/cts protection */ }; /* @@ -198,6 +199,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6000i_2agn_cfg = { .max_ll_items = OTP_MAX_LL_ITEMS_6x00, .shadow_ram_support = true, .ht_greenfield_support = true, + .use_rts_for_ht = true, /* use rts/cts protection */ }; struct iwl_cfg iwl6050_2agn_cfg = { @@ -218,6 +220,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6050_2agn_cfg = { .max_ll_items = OTP_MAX_LL_ITEMS_6x00, .shadow_ram_support = true, .ht_greenfield_support = true, + .use_rts_for_ht = true, /* use rts/cts protection */ }; struct iwl_cfg iwl6000_3agn_cfg = { @@ -238,6 +241,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6000_3agn_cfg = { .max_ll_items = OTP_MAX_LL_ITEMS_6x00, .shadow_ram_support = true, .ht_greenfield_support = true, + .use_rts_for_ht = true, /* use rts/cts protection */ }; struct iwl_cfg iwl6050_3agn_cfg = { @@ -258,6 +262,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6050_3agn_cfg = { .max_ll_items = OTP_MAX_LL_ITEMS_6x00, .shadow_ram_support = true, .ht_greenfield_support = true, + .use_rts_for_ht = true, /* use rts/cts protection */ }; MODULE_FIRMWARE(IWL6000_MODULE_FIRMWARE(IWL6000_UCODE_API_MAX)); diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c index 346dc06fa7b7..81726ee32858 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c @@ -418,6 +418,15 @@ static void rs_tl_turn_on_agg(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 tid, else if (tid == IWL_AGG_ALL_TID) for (tid = 0; tid < TID_MAX_LOAD_COUNT; tid++) rs_tl_turn_on_agg_for_tid(priv, lq_data, tid, sta); + if (priv->cfg->use_rts_for_ht) { + /* + * switch to RTS/CTS if it is the prefer protection method + * for HT traffic + */ + IWL_DEBUG_HT(priv, "use RTS/CTS protection for HT\n"); + priv->staging_rxon.flags &= ~RXON_FLG_SELF_CTS_EN; + iwlcore_commit_rxon(priv); + } } static inline int get_num_of_ant_from_rate(u32 rate_n_flags) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c index 9b5ea8ba7216..877af443aac0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c @@ -115,9 +115,6 @@ int iwl_commit_rxon(struct iwl_priv *priv) /* always get timestamp with Rx frame */ priv->staging_rxon.flags |= RXON_FLG_TSF2HOST_MSK; - /* allow CTS-to-self if possible. this is relevant only for - * 5000, but will not damage 4965 */ - priv->staging_rxon.flags |= RXON_FLG_SELF_CTS_EN; ret = iwl_check_rxon_cmd(priv); if (ret) { @@ -217,6 +214,13 @@ int iwl_commit_rxon(struct iwl_priv *priv) "Could not send WEP static key.\n"); } + /* + * allow CTS-to-self if possible for new association. + * this is relevant only for 5000 series and up, + * but will not damage 4965 + */ + priv->staging_rxon.flags |= RXON_FLG_SELF_CTS_EN; + /* Apply the new configuration * RXON assoc doesn't clear the station table in uCode, */ diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h index e50103a956b1..7754538c2194 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct iwl_mod_params { * @pa_type: used by 6000 series only to identify the type of Power Amplifier * @max_ll_items: max number of OTP blocks * @shadow_ram_support: shadow support for OTP memory + * @use_rts_for_ht: use rts/cts protection for HT traffic * * We enable the driver to be backward compatible wrt API version. The * driver specifies which APIs it supports (with @ucode_api_max being the @@ -255,6 +256,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg { const bool shadow_ram_support; const bool ht_greenfield_support; const bool broken_powersave; + bool use_rts_for_ht; }; /***************************