From: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:03:39 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: [PATCH] Use SA_SHIRQ in sparc specific code.
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.13.1~4
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=76739be851b4fd112f28dd7c2aaff136def09d64;p=karo-tx-linux.git

[PATCH] Use SA_SHIRQ in sparc specific code.

Based upon a report from Jason Wever.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---

diff --git a/drivers/char/rtc.c b/drivers/char/rtc.c
index cd4fe8b1709f..63fff7c1244a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/rtc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/rtc.c
@@ -938,10 +938,9 @@ found:
 
 	/*
 	 * XXX Interrupt pin #7 in Espresso is shared between RTC and
-	 * PCI Slot 2 INTA# (and some INTx# in Slot 1). SA_INTERRUPT here
-	 * is asking for trouble with add-on boards. Change to SA_SHIRQ.
+	 * PCI Slot 2 INTA# (and some INTx# in Slot 1).
 	 */
-	if (request_irq(rtc_irq, rtc_interrupt, SA_INTERRUPT, "rtc", (void *)&rtc_port)) {
+	if (request_irq(rtc_irq, rtc_interrupt, SA_SHIRQ, "rtc", (void *)&rtc_port)) {
 		/*
 		 * Standard way for sparc to print irq's is to use
 		 * __irq_itoa(). I think for EBus it's ok to use %d.