From: Miroslav Lichvar Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:57:07 +0000 (+0200) Subject: kselftests: timers: Fix inconsistency-check to not ignore first timestamp X-Git-Tag: v4.13-rc1~191^2~4^2~1 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7a5de5512296fd2ab7a497e4a576196b1f046e78;p=karo-tx-linux.git kselftests: timers: Fix inconsistency-check to not ignore first timestamp When the first timestamp in the list of clock readings was later than the second timestamp and all other timestamps were in order, the inconsistency was not reported because the index of the out-of-order timestamp was equal to the default value. Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Miroslav Lichvar Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Stephen Boyd Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar Signed-off-by: John Stultz --- diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/inconsistency-check.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/inconsistency-check.c index caf1bc9257c4..74c60e8759a0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/inconsistency-check.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/inconsistency-check.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ int consistency_test(int clock_type, unsigned long seconds) start_str = ctime(&t); while (seconds == -1 || now - then < seconds) { - inconsistent = 0; + inconsistent = -1; /* Fill list */ for (i = 0; i < CALLS_PER_LOOP; i++) @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ int consistency_test(int clock_type, unsigned long seconds) inconsistent = i; /* display inconsistency */ - if (inconsistent) { + if (inconsistent >= 0) { unsigned long long delta; printf("\%s\n", start_str);