From: NeilBrown Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:55:19 +0000 (+1100) Subject: sunrpc: prevent use-after-free on clearing XPT_BUSY X-Git-Tag: v2.6.32.28~38 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7df3fe5e2fcac3f469c4a6d4c4a4c0f4c4020983;p=karo-tx-linux.git sunrpc: prevent use-after-free on clearing XPT_BUSY commit ed2849d3ecfa339435818eeff28f6c3424300cec upstream. When an xprt is created, it has a refcount of 1, and XPT_BUSY is set. The refcount is *not* owned by the thread that created the xprt (as is clear from the fact that creators never put the reference). Rather, it is owned by the absence of XPT_DEAD. Once XPT_DEAD is set, (And XPT_BUSY is clear) that initial reference is dropped and the xprt can be freed. So when a creator clears XPT_BUSY it is dropping its only reference and so must not touch the xprt again. However svc_recv, after calling ->xpo_accept (and so getting an XPT_BUSY reference on a new xprt), calls svc_xprt_recieved. This clears XPT_BUSY and then svc_xprt_enqueue - this last without owning a reference. This is dangerous and has been seen to leave svc_xprt_enqueue working with an xprt containing garbage. So we need to hold an extra counted reference over that call to svc_xprt_received. For safety, any time we clear XPT_BUSY and then use the xprt again, we first get a reference, and the put it again afterwards. Note that svc_close_all does not need this extra protection as there are no threads running, and the final free can only be called asynchronously from such a thread. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c index 3fbd6ba788e5..df760adaa2c9 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv, const char *xprt_name, spin_lock(&svc_xprt_class_lock); list_for_each_entry(xcl, &svc_xprt_class_list, xcl_list) { struct svc_xprt *newxprt; + unsigned short newport; if (strcmp(xprt_name, xcl->xcl_name)) continue; @@ -227,8 +228,9 @@ int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv, const char *xprt_name, spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); list_add(&newxprt->xpt_list, &serv->sv_permsocks); spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); + newport = svc_xprt_local_port(newxprt); clear_bit(XPT_BUSY, &newxprt->xpt_flags); - return svc_xprt_local_port(newxprt); + return newport; } err: spin_unlock(&svc_xprt_class_lock); @@ -430,8 +432,13 @@ void svc_xprt_received(struct svc_xprt *xprt) { BUG_ON(!test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags)); xprt->xpt_pool = NULL; + /* As soon as we clear busy, the xprt could be closed and + * 'put', so we need a reference to call svc_xprt_enqueue with: + */ + svc_xprt_get(xprt); clear_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags); svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt); + svc_xprt_put(xprt); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_xprt_received);