From: Mark Einon Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:59:45 +0000 (+0100) Subject: staging: et131x: Simplify code in nic_rx_pkts() for multicast_pkts_rcvd X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8019f2e2aa76658890dcca0cdff56a78959e3c57;p=linux-beck.git staging: et131x: Simplify code in nic_rx_pkts() for multicast_pkts_rcvd In nic_rx_pkts(), we check that a multicast packet received (when using a multicast list) is one that was requested - despite setting the list up with the hardware. We shouldn't expect to get a mc packet we didn't ask for, so remove these extra checks. This also means that the surrounding code can be tiedied up a little. Tested somewhat with omping, with no adverse effects seen. Also remove this item from the TODO list. Signed-off-by: Mark Einon Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/README b/drivers/staging/et131x/README index 47543ccb8726..a198401abe09 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/et131x/README +++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/README @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ driver as they did not build properly at the time. TODO: - Look at reducing the number of spinlocks - - Simplify code in nic_rx_pkts(), when determining multicast_pkts_rcvd - Reduce the number of split lines by careful consideration of variable names etc. Please send patches to: diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c index e9e269fddd23..724e5007bd1f 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c +++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c @@ -2372,8 +2372,6 @@ static struct rfd *nic_rx_pkts(struct et131x_adapter *adapter) struct rx_status_block *status; struct pkt_stat_desc *psr; struct rfd *rfd; - u32 i; - u8 *buf; unsigned long flags; struct list_head *element; u8 ring_index; @@ -2453,60 +2451,12 @@ static struct rfd *nic_rx_pkts(struct et131x_adapter *adapter) */ if (len < (NIC_MIN_PACKET_SIZE + 4)) { adapter->stats.rx_other_errs++; - len = 0; - } - - if (len == 0) { rfd->len = 0; goto out; } - /* Determine if this is a multicast packet coming in */ - if ((word0 & ALCATEL_MULTICAST_PKT) && - !(word0 & ALCATEL_BROADCAST_PKT)) { - /* Promiscuous mode and Multicast mode are not mutually - * exclusive as was first thought. I guess Promiscuous is just - * considered a super-set of the other filters. Generally filter - * is 0x2b when in promiscuous mode. - */ - if ((adapter->packet_filter & ET131X_PACKET_TYPE_MULTICAST) - && !(adapter->packet_filter & ET131X_PACKET_TYPE_PROMISCUOUS) - && !(adapter->packet_filter & - ET131X_PACKET_TYPE_ALL_MULTICAST)) { - buf = fbr->virt[buff_index]; - - /* Loop through our list to see if the destination - * address of this packet matches one in our list. - */ - for (i = 0; i < adapter->multicast_addr_count; i++) { - if (buf[0] == adapter->multicast_list[i][0] - && buf[1] == adapter->multicast_list[i][1] - && buf[2] == adapter->multicast_list[i][2] - && buf[3] == adapter->multicast_list[i][3] - && buf[4] == adapter->multicast_list[i][4] - && buf[5] == adapter->multicast_list[i][5]) { - break; - } - } - - /* If our index is equal to the number of Multicast - * address we have, then this means we did not find this - * packet's matching address in our list. Set the len to - * zero, so we free our RFD when we return from this - * function. - */ - if (i == adapter->multicast_addr_count) - len = 0; - } - - if (len > 0) - adapter->stats.multicast_pkts_rcvd++; - } - - if (!len) { - rfd->len = 0; - goto out; - } + if ((word0 & ALCATEL_MULTICAST_PKT) && !(word0 & ALCATEL_BROADCAST_PKT)) + adapter->stats.multicast_pkts_rcvd++; rfd->len = len;