From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 06:02:41 +0000 (+0900)
Subject: perf hists browser: Fix a small callchain display bug
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=82162b5ae3d152fd7d887b36213f5b6785fe1294;p=linux-beck.git

perf hists browser: Fix a small callchain display bug

The currently when perf TUI report shows callchain, the first level
chains have bogus '+' sign even though only the last one has children.

Since they are on a single line of the chain, toggling intermediate
entries has no effect.  Fix it to show '+' sign at the last entry only.
Note that non-first level callchain entries don't have this problem.

  Before:
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Children      Self  Command  Shared Object      Symbols
  -   40.70%     0.00%  swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] cpuidle_wrap_enter
     + cpuidle_wrap_enter
     + cpuidle_enter_tk
     + cpuidle_idle_call
     + cpu_idle

  After:
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Children      Self  Command  Shared Object      Symbols
  -   40.70%     0.00%  swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] cpuidle_wrap_enter
       cpuidle_wrap_enter
       cpuidle_enter_tk
       cpuidle_idle_call
     + cpu_idle

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1407909761-10822-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
index 045c1e16ac59..1818d1275d02 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ static void callchain_node__init_have_children(struct callchain_node *node)
 {
 	struct callchain_list *chain;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(chain, &node->val, list)
+	if (!list_empty(&node->val)) {
+		chain = list_entry(node->val.prev, struct callchain_list, list);
 		chain->ms.has_children = !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&node->rb_root);
+	}
 
 	callchain_node__init_have_children_rb_tree(node);
 }