From: Chuansheng Liu Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:29:54 +0000 (-0800) Subject: watchdog: using u64 in get_sample_period() X-Git-Tag: v3.0.54~5 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=872edb5fe78156f8a589e544bbe54eae07226356;p=karo-tx-linux.git watchdog: using u64 in get_sample_period() commit 8ffeb9b0e6369135bf03a073514f571ef10606b9 upstream. In get_sample_period(), unsigned long is not enough: watchdog_thresh * 2 * (NSEC_PER_SEC / 5) case1: watchdog_thresh is 10 by default, the sample value will be: 0xEE6B2800 case2: set watchdog_thresh is 20, the sample value will be: 0x1 DCD6 5000 In case2, we need use u64 to express the sample period. Otherwise, changing the threshold thru proc often can not be successful. Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng Acked-by: Don Zickus Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c index 3d0c56ad4792..53e44324b4d9 100644 --- a/kernel/watchdog.c +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static unsigned long get_timestamp(int this_cpu) return cpu_clock(this_cpu) >> 30LL; /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */ } -static unsigned long get_sample_period(void) +static u64 get_sample_period(void) { /* * convert watchdog_thresh from seconds to ns @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(void) * increment before the hardlockup detector generates * a warning */ - return get_softlockup_thresh() * (NSEC_PER_SEC / 5); + return get_softlockup_thresh() * ((u64)NSEC_PER_SEC / 5); } /* Commands for resetting the watchdog */