From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:47:12 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=885fb909dc17f9240ab3e3420f7f135ae82be01f;p=linux-beck.git

PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example

In example 2 of the generic PM domains DT bindings, the unit address of
the device node representing the child power controller doesn't match
its "reg" property. Correct it.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
index 0f8ed3710c66..025b5e7df61c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Example 2:
 		#power-domain-cells = <1>;
 	};
 
-	child: power-controller@12340000 {
+	child: power-controller@12341000 {
 		compatible = "foo,power-controller";
 		reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
 		power-domains = <&parent 0>;