From: Fenghua Yu Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 08:36:16 +0000 (+0000) Subject: ACPICA: Do not repair _TSS return package if _PSS is present X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8f9c91273e36e5762c617c23e4fd48d5172e0dac;p=linux-beck.git ACPICA: Do not repair _TSS return package if _PSS is present We can only sort the _TSS return package if there is no _PSS in the same scope. This is because if _PSS is present, the ACPI specification dictates that the _TSS Power Dissipation field is to be ignored, and therefore some BIOSs leave garbage values in the _TSS Power field(s). In this case, it is best to just return the _TSS package as-is. Reported-by: Fenghua Yu Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu Signed-off-by: Bob Moore Signed-off-by: Lin Ming Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h index c7f743ca395b..5552125d8340 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ struct acpi_predefined_data { char *pathname; const union acpi_predefined_info *predefined; union acpi_operand_object *parent_package; + struct acpi_namespace_node *node; u32 flags; u8 node_flags; }; diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nspredef.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nspredef.c index 607a9a035262..c845c8089f39 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nspredef.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nspredef.c @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ acpi_ns_check_predefined_names(struct acpi_namespace_node *node, goto cleanup; } data->predefined = predefined; + data->node = node; data->node_flags = node->flags; data->pathname = pathname; diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c index 973883babee1..024c4f263f87 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c @@ -503,6 +503,21 @@ acpi_ns_repair_TSS(struct acpi_predefined_data *data, { union acpi_operand_object *return_object = *return_object_ptr; acpi_status status; + struct acpi_namespace_node *node; + + /* + * We can only sort the _TSS return package if there is no _PSS in the + * same scope. This is because if _PSS is present, the ACPI specification + * dictates that the _TSS Power Dissipation field is to be ignored, and + * therefore some BIOSs leave garbage values in the _TSS Power field(s). + * In this case, it is best to just return the _TSS package as-is. + * (May, 2011) + */ + status = + acpi_ns_get_node(data->node, "^_PSS", ACPI_NS_NO_UPSEARCH, &node); + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { + return (AE_OK); + } status = acpi_ns_check_sorted_list(data, return_object, 5, 1, ACPI_SORT_DESCENDING,