From: Brian Norris Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:53:42 +0000 (-0700) Subject: mtd: spelling fixes X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=92394b5c2be774425f255b5c7afbd8b19978fe12;p=mv-sheeva.git mtd: spelling fixes Signed-off-by: Brian Norris Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ftl.c b/drivers/mtd/ftl.c index 95d77680ad1..c7382bb686c 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ftl.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ftl.c @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static int copy_erase_unit(partition_t *part, uint16_t srcunit, unit with the fewest erases, and usually pick the data unit with the most deleted blocks. But with a small probability, pick the oldest data unit instead. This means that we generally postpone - the next reclaimation as long as possible, but shuffle static + the next reclamation as long as possible, but shuffle static stuff around a bit for wear leveling. ======================================================================*/ diff --git a/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c b/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c index d19898cea55..2ff601f816c 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned int address, * * Return: 0 when succeed, -1 on error. * - * ToDo: 1. Is it neceressary to check_free_sector after erasing ?? + * ToDo: 1. Is it necessary to check_free_sector after erasing ?? */ int INFTL_formatblock(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, int block) { diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c index 22526e98b85..a75d55577e4 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *mtd_inode_mnt __read_mostly; /* * Data structure to hold the pointer to the mtd device as well - * as mode information ofr various use cases. + * as mode information of various use cases. */ struct mtd_file_info { struct mtd_info *mtd; @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int mtd_do_readoob(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint64_t start, /* * Copies (and truncates, if necessary) data from the larger struct, * nand_ecclayout, to the smaller, deprecated layout struct, - * nand_ecclayout_user. This is necessary only to suppport the deprecated + * nand_ecclayout_user. This is necessary only to support the deprecated * API ioctl ECCGETLAYOUT while allowing all new functionality to use * nand_ecclayout flexibly (i.e. the struct may change size in new * releases without requiring major rewrites). diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c index e601672a530..d3fabd144d6 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ struct mtd_info *mtd_concat_create(struct mtd_info *subdev[], /* subdevices to c /* * Set up the new "super" device's MTD object structure, check for - * incompatibilites between the subdevices. + * incompatibilities between the subdevices. */ concat->mtd.type = subdev[0]->type; concat->mtd.flags = subdev[0]->flags; diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c index 887aed02aa2..09bdbac5186 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ out_error: * is used, see 'parse_mtd_partitions()' for more information). If none are * found this functions tries to fallback to information specified in * @parts/@nr_parts. - * * If any parititioning info was found, this function registers the found + * * If any partitioning info was found, this function registers the found * partitions. * * If no partitions were found this function just registers the MTD device * @mtd and exits. diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c index 5e5423b2aed..9961063b90a 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct swap_eb { unsigned int flags; unsigned int active_count; unsigned int erase_count; - unsigned int pad; /* speeds up pointer decremtnt */ + unsigned int pad; /* speeds up pointer decrement */ }; #define MTDSWAP_ECNT_MIN(rbroot) (rb_entry(rb_first(rbroot), struct swap_eb, \ diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c index e3cd1ffad2f..ac4092591ae 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ /* find_boot_record: Find the NFTL Media Header and its Spare copy which contains the * various device information of the NFTL partition and Bad Unit Table. Update - * the ReplUnitTable[] table accroding to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[] + * the ReplUnitTable[] table according to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[] * is used for management of Erase Unit in other routines in nftl.c and nftlmount.c */ static int find_boot_record(struct NFTLrecord *nftl) @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int address, int * * Return: 0 when succeed, -1 on error. * - * ToDo: 1. Is it neceressary to check_free_sector after erasing ?? + * ToDo: 1. Is it necessary to check_free_sector after erasing ?? */ int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) { @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) nb_erases = le32_to_cpu(uci.WearInfo); nb_erases++; - /* wrap (almost impossible with current flashs) or free block */ + /* wrap (almost impossible with current flash) or free block */ if (nb_erases == 0) nb_erases = 1; @@ -363,10 +363,10 @@ fail: * Mark as 'IGNORE' each incorrect sector. This check is only done if the chain * was being folded when NFTL was interrupted. * - * The check_free_sectors in this function is neceressary. There is a possible + * The check_free_sectors in this function is necessary. There is a possible * situation that after writing the Data area, the Block Control Information is * not updated according (due to power failure or something) which leaves the block - * in an umconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this + * in an inconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this * case. */ static void check_sectors_in_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) { @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) for (;;) { length++; - /* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranted not to + /* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranteed not to happen because of the previous checks */ if (length >= nftl->nb_blocks) { printk("nftl: length too long %d !\n", length); @@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) /* format_chain: Format an invalid Virtual Unit chain. It frees all the Erase Units in a * Virtual Unit Chain, i.e. all the units are disconnected. * - * It is not stricly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because + * It is not strictly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because * if we stop the code, we may see again a valid chain if there was a first_block * flag in a block inside it. But is it really a problem ? * - * FixMe: Figure out what the last statesment means. What if power failure when we are + * FixMe: Figure out what the last statement means. What if power failure when we are * in the for (;;) loop formatting blocks ?? */ static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) * totally free (only 0xff). * * Definition: Free Erase Unit -- A properly erased/formatted Free Erase Unit should have meet the - * following critia: + * following criteria: * 1. */ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) { @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) erase_mark = le16_to_cpu ((h1.EraseMark | h1.EraseMark1)); if (erase_mark != ERASE_MARK) { /* if no erase mark, the block must be totally free. This is - possible in two cases : empty filsystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */ + possible in two cases : empty filesystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */ if (check_free_sectors (nftl, block * nftl->EraseSize, nftl->EraseSize, 1) != 0) return -1; @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block) /* get_fold_mark: Read fold mark from Unit Control Information #2, we use FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS * to indicate that we are in the progression of a Virtual Unit Chain folding. If the UCI #2 * is FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS when mounting the NFTL, the (previous) folding process is interrupted - * for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is neceressary in this case. + * for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is necessary in this case. * * WARNING: return 0 if read error */ @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s) printk("Block %d: incorrect logical block: %d expected: %d\n", block, logical_block, first_logical_block); /* the chain is incorrect : we must format it, - but we need to read it completly */ + but we need to read it completely */ do_format_chain = 1; } if (is_first_block) { @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s) printk("Block %d: incorrectly marked as first block in chain\n", block); /* the chain is incorrect : we must format it, - but we need to read it completly */ + but we need to read it completely */ do_format_chain = 1; } else { printk("Block %d: folding in progress - ignoring first block flag\n", diff --git a/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c b/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c index a8befde81ce..311a9e39a95 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ module_param(debug, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR); MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0-2)"); -/* ------------------- sysfs attributtes ---------------------------------- */ +/* ------------------- sysfs attributes ---------------------------------- */ struct sm_sysfs_attribute { struct device_attribute dev_attr; char *data; @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int sm_get_lba(uint8_t *lba) /* - * Read LBA asscociated with block + * Read LBA associated with block * returns -1, if block is erased * returns -2 if error happens */ @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int sm_read_sector(struct sm_ftl *ftl, return 0; } - /* User might not need the oob, but we do for data vertification */ + /* User might not need the oob, but we do for data verification */ if (!oob) oob = &tmp_oob; @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ again: return ret; } - /* Unfortunelly, oob read will _always_ succeed, + /* Unfortunately, oob read will _always_ succeed, despite card removal..... */ ret = mtd->read_oob(mtd, sm_mkoffset(ftl, zone, block, boffset), &ops); @@ -447,14 +447,14 @@ static void sm_mark_block_bad(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone, int block) /* We aren't checking the return value, because we don't care */ /* This also fails on fake xD cards, but I guess these won't expose - any bad blocks till fail completly */ + any bad blocks till fail completely */ for (boffset = 0; boffset < ftl->block_size; boffset += SM_SECTOR_SIZE) sm_write_sector(ftl, zone, block, boffset, NULL, &oob); } /* * Erase a block within a zone - * If erase succedes, it updates free block fifo, otherwise marks block as bad + * If erase succeeds, it updates free block fifo, otherwise marks block as bad */ static int sm_erase_block(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone_num, uint16_t block, int put_free) @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void sm_erase_callback(struct erase_info *self) complete(&ftl->erase_completion); } -/* Throughtly test that block is valid. */ +/* Thoroughly test that block is valid. */ static int sm_check_block(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone, int block) { int boffset; @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int sm_check_block(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone, int block) for (boffset = 0; boffset < ftl->block_size; boffset += SM_SECTOR_SIZE) { - /* This shoudn't happen anyway */ + /* This shouldn't happen anyway */ if (sm_read_sector(ftl, zone, block, boffset, NULL, &oob)) return -2;