From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:28:19 +0000 (+1000) Subject: drm/radeon: Add a rmb() in IH processing X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=964f664520a4c6a247e2c9ff8b4481631cf746df;p=linux-beck.git drm/radeon: Add a rmb() in IH processing We should have a read memory barrier between reading the WPTR from memory and reading ring entries based on that value (ie, we need to ensure both loads are done in order by the CPU). It could be argued that the MMIO reads in r600_ack_irq() might be enough to get that barrier but I prefer keeping an explicit one just in case. [airlied: fix evergreen + r/w mixup] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Reviewed-by: Matt Turner Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c index 37dd6449f46f..bcd55917c7cc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c @@ -2759,6 +2759,9 @@ int evergreen_irq_process(struct radeon_device *rdev) return IRQ_NONE; } restart_ih: + /* Order reading of wptr vs. reading of IH ring data */ + rmb(); + /* display interrupts */ evergreen_irq_ack(rdev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c index f56e65579835..aa5571b73aa0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c @@ -3318,6 +3318,9 @@ int r600_irq_process(struct radeon_device *rdev) } restart_ih: + /* Order reading of wptr vs. reading of IH ring data */ + rmb(); + /* display interrupts */ r600_irq_ack(rdev);