From: Christian König Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 21:16:15 +0000 (-0500) Subject: drm/ttm: fix ttm_bo_wait X-Git-Tag: v4.10-rc1~154^2~36^2~11 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=98a6dd909bbd247ce10f36ce709906bc5e9dfeb0;p=karo-tx-linux.git drm/ttm: fix ttm_bo_wait reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() should enable signaling even with a zero timeout, but ttm_bo_wait() can also be called from atomic context and then it is not a good idea to do this. Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Christian König Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal [sumits: fix checkpatch warnings] Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-3-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index f6ff579e8918..d5063618efa7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -1611,7 +1611,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_unmap_virtual); int ttm_bo_wait(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool interruptible, bool no_wait) { - long timeout = no_wait ? 0 : 15 * HZ; + long timeout = 15 * HZ; + + if (no_wait) { + if (reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(bo->resv, true)) + return 0; + else + return -EBUSY; + } timeout = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(bo->resv, true, interruptible, timeout);