From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 05:56:48 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: net/iucv: Add missing spin_unlock
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a56635a56f2afb3d22d9ce07e8f8d69537416b2d;p=linux-beck.git

net/iucv: Add missing spin_unlock

Add a spin_unlock missing on the error path.  There seems like no reason
why the lock should continue to be held if the kzalloc fail.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@

* spin_lock(E1,...);
  <+... when != E1
  if (...) {
    ... when != E1
*   return ...;
  }
  ...+>
* spin_unlock(E1,...);
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
index c8b4599a752e..9637e45744fa 100644
--- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
+++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
@@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ static void iucv_callback_rx(struct iucv_path *path, struct iucv_message *msg)
 save_message:
 	save_msg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sock_msg_q), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
 	if (!save_msg)
-		return;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	save_msg->path = path;
 	save_msg->msg = *msg;