From: Yi Zou Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 17:40:31 +0000 (-0700) Subject: [SCSI] libfc: fix sending REC after FCP_RESP is received X-Git-Tag: next-20120724~69^2~27 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a752359f2b0a291c5f229e883842e4b30c698387;p=karo-tx-linux.git [SCSI] libfc: fix sending REC after FCP_RESP is received This is exposed in the case the FCP_DATA frames somehow got lost and fc_fcp got the FCP_RSP, in fc_fcp_recv_resp(), since xfer_len is less than the expected_len it resets the the timer to wait to 2 more jiffies in case the data frames are already queued locally. However, for target does not support REC, it would just send RJT w/ ELS_RJT_UNSUP. The rec response handler thus only clears the rport flag for not doing REC later, but does not do fcp_io_complete() on the associated fsp. The fix is just check status of FCP_RSP being received already, i.e. using the FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS flag, in fc_fcp_timeout before start sending REC. We should have waited long enough if there is truely data frames queued locally. Signed-off-by: Yi Zou Tested-by: Ross Brattain Signed-off-by: Robert Love Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c index 3c96e9300d00..14243fa5f8e8 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c @@ -1380,10 +1380,10 @@ static void fc_fcp_timeout(unsigned long data) fsp->state |= FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO; - if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED) - fc_fcp_rec(fsp); - else if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS) + if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS) fc_fcp_complete_locked(fsp); + else if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED) + fc_fcp_rec(fsp); else fc_fcp_recovery(fsp, FC_TIMED_OUT); fsp->state &= ~FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO;