From: Moritz Kühner Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 14:15:24 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr: don't add invalid voltage X-Git-Tag: v4.7-rc1~77^2~23^2~7 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ac0cc35008d570f5338b72f48960467c764b0f36;p=karo-tx-linux.git drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr: don't add invalid voltage if atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk returns non zero (fail) in the expansion of the PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE macro the continue will actually do nothing (The macro uses a do ... while(0) as scope, which eats the continue). Based on the code I don't think this was the intent. Unfortunately fixing this requires rewriting the control flow and removing the macros. v2: added signed of by fixed error message print v3: agd: drop DRM_ERROR Signed-off-by: Moritz Kühner Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/tonga_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/tonga_hwmgr.c index 59dd78c05596..9aaf194fc7cd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/tonga_hwmgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/tonga_hwmgr.c @@ -432,19 +432,20 @@ int tonga_get_evv_voltage(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr) } } } - PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk - (hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDGFX, sclk, - virtual_voltage_id, &vddgfx), - "Error retrieving EVV voltage value!", continue); - - /* need to make sure vddgfx is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */ - PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE((vddgfx < 2000 && vddgfx != 0), "Invalid VDDGFX value!", return -1); - - /* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */ - if (vddgfx != 0 && vddgfx != virtual_voltage_id) { - data->vddcgfx_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = vddgfx; - data->vddcgfx_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id; - data->vddcgfx_leakage.count++; + if (0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk + (hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDGFX, sclk, + virtual_voltage_id, &vddgfx)) { + /* need to make sure vddgfx is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */ + PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE((vddgfx < 2000 && vddgfx != 0), "Invalid VDDGFX value!", return -1); + + /* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */ + if (vddgfx != 0 && vddgfx != virtual_voltage_id) { + data->vddcgfx_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = vddgfx; + data->vddcgfx_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id; + data->vddcgfx_leakage.count++; + } + } else { + printk("Error retrieving EVV voltage value!\n"); } } } else { @@ -452,19 +453,20 @@ int tonga_get_evv_voltage(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr) if (0 == tonga_get_sclk_for_voltage_evv(hwmgr, pptable_info->vddc_lookup_table, virtual_voltage_id, &sclk)) { - PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk - (hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDC, sclk, - virtual_voltage_id, &vddc), - "Error retrieving EVV voltage value!", continue); - - /* need to make sure vddc is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */ - PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(vddc < 2000, "Invalid VDDC value!", return -1); - - /* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */ - if (vddc != 0 && vddc != virtual_voltage_id) { - data->vddc_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddc_leakage.count] = vddc; - data->vddc_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddc_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id; - data->vddc_leakage.count++; + if (0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk + (hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDC, sclk, + virtual_voltage_id, &vddc)) { + /* need to make sure vddc is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */ + PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(vddc < 2000, "Invalid VDDC value!", return -1); + + /* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */ + if (vddc != 0 && vddc != virtual_voltage_id) { + data->vddc_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddc_leakage.count] = vddc; + data->vddc_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddc_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id; + data->vddc_leakage.count++; + } + } else { + printk("Error retrieving EVV voltage value!\n"); } } }