From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 04:31:24 +0000 (+0900)
Subject: pwm: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=adcba1e3a5d97d93f2277bcf38ae1eb2c91fc840;p=linux-beck.git

pwm: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts()
instead of seq_printf(). Also, the following checkpatch warning is
fixed.

  WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 2ca95042a0b9..a80471399c20 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -808,12 +808,12 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s)
 		seq_printf(s, " pwm-%-3d (%-20.20s):", i, pwm->label);
 
 		if (test_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags))
-			seq_printf(s, " requested");
+			seq_puts(s, " requested");
 
 		if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags))
-			seq_printf(s, " enabled");
+			seq_puts(s, " enabled");
 
-		seq_printf(s, "\n");
+		seq_puts(s, "\n");
 	}
 }