From: Paul E. McKenney Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:57:54 +0000 (-0700) Subject: rcu: Fix obsolete rcu_initiate_boost() header comment X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b065a85354239cc96295f696eeace67ad3a55e5c;p=linux-beck.git rcu: Fix obsolete rcu_initiate_boost() header comment Commit 1217ed1b (rcu: permit rcu_read_unlock() to be called while holding runqueue locks) made rcu_initiate_boost() restore irq state when releasing the rcu_node structure's ->lock, but failed to update the header comment accordingly. This commit therefore brings the header comment up to date. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h index 15d28febbbd4..c47b28bf18ae 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h @@ -1197,9 +1197,9 @@ static int rcu_boost_kthread(void *arg) * kthread to start boosting them. If there is an expedited grace * period in progress, it is always time to boost. * - * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases, - * but irqs remain disabled. The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal, - * so we don't need to worry about it going away. + * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases. + * The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal, so we don't need to worry + * about it going away. */ static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags) {