From: Changbin Du Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 04:35:31 +0000 (+0800) Subject: drm/i915/gvt: Use force single submit flag to distinguish gvt request from i915 request X-Git-Tag: v4.11-rc5~25^2~1^2~1^2 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bc2d4b62db67f817b09c782219996630e9c2f5e2;p=karo-tx-linux.git drm/i915/gvt: Use force single submit flag to distinguish gvt request from i915 request In my previous Commit ab9da627906a ("drm/i915: make context status notifier head be per engine") rely on scheduler->current_workload[x] to distinguish gvt spacial request from i915 request. But this is not always true since no synchronization between workload_thread and lrc irq handler. lrc irq handler workload_thread ---- ---- pick i915 requests; intel_vgpu_submit_execlist(); current_workload[x] = xxx; shadow_context_status_change(); Then current_workload[x] is not null but current request is of i915 self. So instead we check ctx flag CONTEXT_FORCE_SINGLE_SUBMISSION. Only gvt request set this flag and always set. v2: Reverse the order of multi-condition 'if' statement. Fixes: ab9da6279 ("drm/i915: make context status notifier head be per engine") Signed-off-by: Changbin Du Reviewed-by: Yulei Zhang Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c index 39a83eb7aecc..d0c04155f7d5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c @@ -127,6 +127,11 @@ static int populate_shadow_context(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload) return 0; } +static inline bool is_gvt_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req) +{ + return i915_gem_context_force_single_submission(req->ctx); +} + static int shadow_context_status_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *data) { @@ -139,7 +144,7 @@ static int shadow_context_status_change(struct notifier_block *nb, struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload = scheduler->current_workload[req->engine->id]; - if (unlikely(!workload)) + if (!is_gvt_request(req) || unlikely(!workload)) return NOTIFY_OK; switch (action) {