From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:22:19 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: drm/nouveau: fix __nouveau_fence_wait performance
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bd35fe5a7930bf83ed56422ea4e4b6471ee6f739;p=linux-beck.git

drm/nouveau: fix __nouveau_fence_wait performance

Commit 21e86c1c8a844bf978f8fc431a59c9f5a578812d ("drm/nouveau: remove
cpu_writers lock") turned on lazy waits. Unfortunately
__nouveau_fence_wait was not optimized for this case and on HZ=100
kernel wasted up to 10 ms per call.

Depending on application, it led to 10-30% FPS regression.

Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
---

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
index a244702bb227..4b9f4493c9f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
 #include "drmP.h"
 #include "drm.h"
 
+#include <linux/ktime.h>
+#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
+
 #include "nouveau_drv.h"
 #include "nouveau_ramht.h"
 #include "nouveau_dma.h"
@@ -229,7 +232,8 @@ int
 __nouveau_fence_wait(void *sync_obj, void *sync_arg, bool lazy, bool intr)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + (3 * DRM_HZ);
-	unsigned long sleep_time = jiffies + 1;
+	unsigned long sleep_time = NSEC_PER_MSEC / 1000;
+	ktime_t t;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	while (1) {
@@ -243,8 +247,13 @@ __nouveau_fence_wait(void *sync_obj, void *sync_arg, bool lazy, bool intr)
 
 		__set_current_state(intr ? TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
 			: TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		if (lazy && time_after_eq(jiffies, sleep_time))
-			schedule_timeout(1);
+		if (lazy) {
+			t = ktime_set(0, sleep_time);
+			schedule_hrtimeout(&t, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
+			sleep_time *= 2;
+			if (sleep_time > NSEC_PER_MSEC)
+				sleep_time = NSEC_PER_MSEC;
+		}
 
 		if (intr && signal_pending(current)) {
 			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;