From: Ville Syrjälä Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:52:46 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/nouveau: Fix crtc->primary->fb vs. drm_fb fail X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bdcb2f91069337b3d577d69c15dbd1f5b8f683e8;p=linux-beck.git drm/nouveau: Fix crtc->primary->fb vs. drm_fb fail So it looks like the code is trying to pick between the passed in fb and crtc->primary->fb based on that funky 'bool atomic'. But later it will mix uses of both drm_fb (which was picked by the aforementioned logic) and crtc->primary->fb. So looks like a bug to me. Let's make it use drm_fb only. Cc: Ben Skeggs Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479498793-31021-11-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c index 59d1d1c5de5f..7c6c66f177df 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c @@ -854,9 +854,9 @@ nv04_crtc_do_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc, /* Update the framebuffer format. */ regp->CRTC[NV_CIO_CRE_PIXEL_INDEX] &= ~3; - regp->CRTC[NV_CIO_CRE_PIXEL_INDEX] |= (crtc->primary->fb->depth + 1) / 8; + regp->CRTC[NV_CIO_CRE_PIXEL_INDEX] |= (drm_fb->depth + 1) / 8; regp->ramdac_gen_ctrl &= ~NV_PRAMDAC_GENERAL_CONTROL_ALT_MODE_SEL; - if (crtc->primary->fb->depth == 16) + if (drm_fb->depth == 16) regp->ramdac_gen_ctrl |= NV_PRAMDAC_GENERAL_CONTROL_ALT_MODE_SEL; crtc_wr_cio_state(crtc, regp, NV_CIO_CRE_PIXEL_INDEX); NVWriteRAMDAC(dev, nv_crtc->index, NV_PRAMDAC_GENERAL_CONTROL,