From: Ville Syrjälä Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:16:37 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/i915: Adjust obj tiling vs. fb modifier rules X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c2ff7370aee6ba750859d7008d05c68e873d7c7b;p=linux-beck.git drm/i915: Adjust obj tiling vs. fb modifier rules Currently we require the object to be X tiled if the fb is X tiled. The argument is supposedly FBC GTT tracking. But actually that no longer holds water since FBC supports Y tiling as well on SKL+. A better rule IMO is to require that if there is a fence, the fb modifier match the object tiling mode. But if the object is linear, we can allow the fb modifier to be anything. The idea being that if the user set the tiling mode on the object, presumably the intention is to actually use the fence for CPU access. But if the tiling mode is not set, the user has no intention of using a fence (and can't actually since we disallow tiling mode changes when there are framebuffers associated with the object). On gen2/3 we must keep to the rule that the object and fb must be either both linear or both X tiled. No mixing allowed since the display engine itself will use the fence if it's present. v2: Fix typos v3: Rebase due to i915_gem_object_get_tiling() & co. Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470821001-25272-7-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index b1d5fca5e14d..d7e30eea7f0a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -15202,23 +15202,26 @@ static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); + unsigned int tiling = i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj); int ret; u32 pitch_limit, stride_alignment; WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->struct_mutex)); if (mode_cmd->flags & DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS) { - /* Enforce that fb modifier and tiling mode match, but only for - * X-tiled. This is needed for FBC. */ - if (!!(i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj) == I915_TILING_X) != - !!(mode_cmd->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED)) { + /* + * If there's a fence, enforce that + * the fb modifier and tiling mode match. + */ + if (tiling != I915_TILING_NONE && + tiling != intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling(mode_cmd->modifier[0])) { DRM_DEBUG("tiling_mode doesn't match fb modifier\n"); return -EINVAL; } } else { - if (i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj) == I915_TILING_X) + if (tiling == I915_TILING_X) { mode_cmd->modifier[0] = I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED; - else if (i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj) == I915_TILING_Y) { + } else if (tiling == I915_TILING_Y) { DRM_DEBUG("No Y tiling for legacy addfb\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -15242,6 +15245,16 @@ static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, return -EINVAL; } + /* + * gen2/3 display engine uses the fence if present, + * so the tiling mode must match the fb modifier exactly. + */ + if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen < 4 && + tiling != intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling(mode_cmd->modifier[0])) { + DRM_DEBUG("tiling_mode must match fb modifier exactly on gen2/3\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + stride_alignment = intel_fb_stride_alignment(dev_priv, mode_cmd->modifier[0], mode_cmd->pixel_format); @@ -15261,7 +15274,11 @@ static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, return -EINVAL; } - if (mode_cmd->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED && + /* + * If there's a fence, enforce that + * the fb pitch and fence stride match. + */ + if (tiling != I915_TILING_NONE && mode_cmd->pitches[0] != i915_gem_object_get_stride(obj)) { DRM_DEBUG("pitch (%d) must match tiling stride (%d)\n", mode_cmd->pitches[0],