From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:27:21 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c41bf8fa5e777b6a8a19cf2484937a7167eac77f;p=linux-beck.git

[PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu

There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
---

diff --git a/include/asm-i386/i387.h b/include/asm-i386/i387.h
index 49dc8e141310..cdd1e248e3b4 100644
--- a/include/asm-i386/i387.h
+++ b/include/asm-i386/i387.h
@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu( struct task_struct *tsk )
 	task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
 }
 
-#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
-	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) \
-		save_init_fpu( tsk ); 			\
-	else						\
-		tsk->fpu_counter = 0;			\
+#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do {				\
+	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {	\
+		__save_init_fpu(tsk);				\
+		stts();						\
+	} else							\
+		tsk->fpu_counter = 0;				\
 } while (0)
 
 #define __clear_fpu( tsk )					\