From: Ilpo Järvinen Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:18:55 +0000 (-0700) Subject: tcp: move tcp_verify_retransmit_hint X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c8c213f20ce97c66fe2ff86f33814d1ca0f9d7ea;p=linux-beck.git tcp: move tcp_verify_retransmit_hint Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 7306bfb16cdb..9e95ad637db9 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -979,6 +979,19 @@ static void tcp_update_reordering(struct sock *sk, const int metric, } } +/* RFC: This is from the original, I doubt that this is necessary at all: + * clear xmit_retrans hint if seq of this skb is beyond hint. How could we + * retransmitted past LOST markings in the first place? I'm not fully sure + * about undo and end of connection cases, which can cause R without L? + */ +static void tcp_verify_retransmit_hint(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + if ((tp->retransmit_skb_hint != NULL) && + before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, + TCP_SKB_CB(tp->retransmit_skb_hint)->seq)) + tp->retransmit_skb_hint = NULL; +} + /* This procedure tags the retransmission queue when SACKs arrive. * * We have three tag bits: SACKED(S), RETRANS(R) and LOST(L). @@ -2156,19 +2169,6 @@ static int tcp_time_to_recover(struct sock *sk) return 0; } -/* RFC: This is from the original, I doubt that this is necessary at all: - * clear xmit_retrans hint if seq of this skb is beyond hint. How could we - * retransmitted past LOST markings in the first place? I'm not fully sure - * about undo and end of connection cases, which can cause R without L? - */ -static void tcp_verify_retransmit_hint(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb) -{ - if ((tp->retransmit_skb_hint != NULL) && - before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, - TCP_SKB_CB(tp->retransmit_skb_hint)->seq)) - tp->retransmit_skb_hint = NULL; -} - /* Mark head of queue up as lost. With RFC3517 SACK, the packets is * is against sacked "cnt", otherwise it's against facked "cnt" */