From: Jeff Mahoney Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:28:28 +0000 (-0500) Subject: btrfs: fix locking when we put back a delayed ref that's too new X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d0280996437081dd12ed1e982ac8aeaa62835ec4;p=linux-beck.git btrfs: fix locking when we put back a delayed ref that's too new In __btrfs_run_delayed_refs, when we put back a delayed ref that's too new, we have already dropped the lock on locked_ref when we set ->processing = 0. This patch keeps the lock to cover that assignment. Fixes: d7df2c796d7 (Btrfs: attach delayed ref updates to delayed ref heads) Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney Reviewed-by: Liu Bo Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 5366e50c84c6..ac7e6713033c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -2522,11 +2522,11 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (ref && ref->seq && btrfs_check_delayed_seq(fs_info, delayed_refs, ref->seq)) { spin_unlock(&locked_ref->lock); - btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(locked_ref); spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock); locked_ref->processing = 0; delayed_refs->num_heads_ready++; spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock); + btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(locked_ref); locked_ref = NULL; cond_resched(); count++;