From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:53:17 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: jbd2: use a better hash function for the revoke table
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d48458d4a768;p=linux-beck.git

jbd2: use a better hash function for the revoke table

The old hash function didn't work well for 64-bit block numbers, and
used undefined (negative) shift right behavior.  Use the generic
64-bit hash function instead.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
---

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
index d5e95a175c92..c6cbaef2bda1 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/bio.h>
 #include <linux/log2.h>
+#include <linux/hash.h>
 #endif
 
 static struct kmem_cache *jbd2_revoke_record_cache;
@@ -130,16 +131,9 @@ static void flush_descriptor(journal_t *, struct buffer_head *, int, int);
 
 /* Utility functions to maintain the revoke table */
 
-/* Borrowed from buffer.c: this is a tried and tested block hash function */
 static inline int hash(journal_t *journal, unsigned long long block)
 {
-	struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table = journal->j_revoke;
-	int hash_shift = table->hash_shift;
-	int hash = (int)block ^ (int)((block >> 31) >> 1);
-
-	return ((hash << (hash_shift - 6)) ^
-		(hash >> 13) ^
-		(hash << (hash_shift - 12))) & (table->hash_size - 1);
+	return hash_64(block, journal->j_revoke->hash_shift);
 }
 
 static int insert_revoke_hash(journal_t *journal, unsigned long long blocknr,