From: Eyal Shapira Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:30:20 +0000 (+0200) Subject: iwlwifi: mvm: rs: consider a missing BA as a single tx failure X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d6bda6671f8fda961f6cce95e644f6a14fe5bd2a;p=linux-beck.git iwlwifi: mvm: rs: consider a missing BA as a single tx failure The fw now indicates missing BA with ampdu_ack_len=0. This will make the whole aggregation being marked as failed, although it's most likely not the case (and only the BA itself was failed). Consider this case as a single tx failure. Signed-off-by: Eyal Shapira Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c index c05f5a509a5d..30ceb67ed7a7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c @@ -1204,6 +1204,13 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, * first index into rate scale table. */ if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU) { + /* ampdu_ack_len = 0 marks no BA was received. In this case + * treat it as a single frame loss as we don't want the success + * ratio to dip too quickly because a BA wasn't received + */ + if (info->status.ampdu_ack_len == 0) + info->status.ampdu_len = 1; + ucode_rate = le32_to_cpu(table->rs_table[0]); rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(ucode_rate, info->band, &rate); rs_collect_tx_data(lq_sta, curr_tbl, rate.index,