From: Patrick Pannuto Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 00:12:41 +0000 (-0700) Subject: driver core: platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming platform_bus_type X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d79d32440c33cf60f1e0efbeb8144b1647be0b50;p=linux-beck.git driver core: platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming platform_bus_type In theory (although not *yet* in practice), a driver being passed to platform_driver_probe might have driver.bus set to something other than platform_bus_type. Locking drv->driver.bus is always correct. Signed-off-by: Patrick Pannuto Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c index c6c933f58102..579906f88b09 100644 --- a/drivers/base/platform.c +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c @@ -488,12 +488,12 @@ int __init_or_module platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver *drv, * if the probe was successful, and make sure any forced probes of * new devices fail. */ - spin_lock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock); + spin_lock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock); drv->probe = NULL; if (code == 0 && list_empty(&drv->driver.p->klist_devices.k_list)) retval = -ENODEV; drv->driver.probe = platform_drv_probe_fail; - spin_unlock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock); + spin_unlock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock); if (code != retval) platform_driver_unregister(drv);