From: Paul E. McKenney Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:25:06 +0000 (-0700) Subject: rcu: Eliminate deadlock between CPU hotplug and expedited grace periods X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dd56af42bd829c6e770ed69812bd65a04eaeb1e4;p=linux-beck.git rcu: Eliminate deadlock between CPU hotplug and expedited grace periods Currently, the expedited grace-period primitives do get_online_cpus(). This greatly simplifies their implementation, but means that calls to them holding locks that are acquired by CPU-hotplug notifiers (to say nothing of calls to these primitives from CPU-hotplug notifiers) can deadlock. But this is starting to become inconvenient, as can be seen here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/5/754. The problem in this case is that some developers need to acquire a mutex from a CPU-hotplug notifier, but also need to hold it across a synchronize_rcu_expedited(). As noted above, this currently results in deadlock. This commit avoids the deadlock and retains the simplicity by creating a try_get_online_cpus(), which returns false if the get_online_cpus() reference count could not immediately be incremented. If a call to try_get_online_cpus() returns true, the expedited primitives operate as before. If a call returns false, the expedited primitives fall back to normal grace-period operations. This falling back of course results in increased grace-period latency, but only during times when CPU hotplug operations are actually in flight. The effect should therefore be negligible during normal operation. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Josh Triplett Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Tested-by: Lan Tianyu --- diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h index 95978ad7fcdd..b2d9a43012b2 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpu.h +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ extern struct bus_type cpu_subsys; extern void cpu_hotplug_begin(void); extern void cpu_hotplug_done(void); extern void get_online_cpus(void); +extern bool try_get_online_cpus(void); extern void put_online_cpus(void); extern void cpu_hotplug_disable(void); extern void cpu_hotplug_enable(void); @@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu); static inline void cpu_hotplug_begin(void) {} static inline void cpu_hotplug_done(void) {} #define get_online_cpus() do { } while (0) +#define try_get_online_cpus() true #define put_online_cpus() do { } while (0) #define cpu_hotplug_disable() do { } while (0) #define cpu_hotplug_enable() do { } while (0) diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h index 008388f920d7..4f86465cc317 100644 --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h @@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events(struct task_struct *curr) #define lock_map_acquire(l) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, 0, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_) #define lock_map_acquire_read(l) lock_acquire_shared_recursive(l, 0, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_) +#define lock_map_acquire_tryread(l) lock_acquire_shared_recursive(l, 0, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_) #define lock_map_release(l) lock_release(l, 1, _THIS_IP_) #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 81e2a388a0f6..356450f09c1f 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ static struct { /* Lockdep annotations for get/put_online_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_begin/end() */ #define cpuhp_lock_acquire_read() lock_map_acquire_read(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map) +#define cpuhp_lock_acquire_tryread() \ + lock_map_acquire_tryread(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map) #define cpuhp_lock_acquire() lock_map_acquire(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map) #define cpuhp_lock_release() lock_map_release(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map) @@ -91,10 +93,22 @@ void get_online_cpus(void) mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock); cpu_hotplug.refcount++; mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock); - } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_online_cpus); +bool try_get_online_cpus(void) +{ + if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current) + return true; + if (!mutex_trylock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)) + return false; + cpuhp_lock_acquire_tryread(); + cpu_hotplug.refcount++; + mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock); + return true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(try_get_online_cpus); + void put_online_cpus(void) { if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index d7a3b13bc94c..133e47223095 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2940,11 +2940,6 @@ static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data) * restructure your code to batch your updates, and then use a single * synchronize_sched() instead. * - * Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any lock - * that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier. And yes, it is also illegal - * to call this function from a CPU-hotplug notifier. Failing to observe - * these restriction will result in deadlock. - * * This implementation can be thought of as an application of ticket * locking to RCU, with sync_sched_expedited_started and * sync_sched_expedited_done taking on the roles of the halves @@ -2994,7 +2989,12 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void) */ snap = atomic_long_inc_return(&rsp->expedited_start); firstsnap = snap; - get_online_cpus(); + if (!try_get_online_cpus()) { + /* CPU hotplug operation in flight, fall back to normal GP. */ + wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched); + atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal); + return; + } WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(raw_smp_processor_id())); /* @@ -3041,7 +3041,12 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void) * and they started after our first try, so their grace * period works for us. */ - get_online_cpus(); + if (!try_get_online_cpus()) { + /* CPU hotplug operation in flight, use normal GP. */ + wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched); + atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal); + return; + } snap = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_start); smp_mb(); /* ensure read is before try_stop_cpus(). */ } diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h index e2c5910546f6..387dd4599344 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h @@ -793,11 +793,6 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) * In fact, if you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, * please restructure your code to batch your updates, and then Use a * single synchronize_rcu() instead. - * - * Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any lock - * that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier. And yes, it is also illegal - * to call this function from a CPU-hotplug notifier. Failing to observe - * these restriction will result in deadlock. */ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void) { @@ -819,7 +814,11 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void) * being boosted. This simplifies the process of moving tasks * from leaf to root rcu_node structures. */ - get_online_cpus(); + if (!try_get_online_cpus()) { + /* CPU-hotplug operation in flight, fall back to normal GP. */ + wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu); + return; + } /* * Acquire lock, falling back to synchronize_rcu() if too many