From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:23:35 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=df2d5ae4995b3fb9392b6089b9623d20b6c3a542;p=linux-beck.git

workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues

Currently, an unbound workqueue has only one "current" pool_workqueue
associated with it.  It may have multple pool_workqueues but only the
first pool_workqueue servies new work items.  For NUMA affinity, we
want to change this so that there are multiple current pool_workqueues
serving different NUMA nodes.

Introduce workqueue->numa_pwq_tbl[] which is indexed by NUMA node and
points to the pool_workqueue to use for each possible node.  This
replaces first_pwq() in __queue_work() and workqueue_congested().

numa_pwq_tbl[] is currently initialized to point to the same
pool_workqueue as first_pwq() so this patch doesn't make any behavior
changes.

v2: Use rcu_dereference_raw() in unbound_pwq_by_node() as the function
    may be called only with wq->mutex held.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 4c53fa216732..170226a24da8 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
 	/* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */
 	unsigned int		flags ____cacheline_aligned; /* WQ: WQ_* flags */
 	struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwqs; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
+	struct pool_workqueue __rcu *numa_pwq_tbl[]; /* FR: unbound pwqs indexed by node */
 };
 
 static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;
@@ -525,6 +526,22 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *first_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 				      pwqs_node);
 }
 
+/**
+ * unbound_pwq_by_node - return the unbound pool_workqueue for the given node
+ * @wq: the target workqueue
+ * @node: the node ID
+ *
+ * This must be called either with pwq_lock held or sched RCU read locked.
+ * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
+ * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
+ */
+static struct pool_workqueue *unbound_pwq_by_node(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+						  int node)
+{
+	assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq);
+	return rcu_dereference_raw(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node]);
+}
+
 static unsigned int work_color_to_flags(int color)
 {
 	return color << WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_SHIFT;
@@ -1278,14 +1295,14 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	    WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq)))
 		return;
 retry:
+	if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+		cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
 	/* pwq which will be used unless @work is executing elsewhere */
-	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
-		if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
-			cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
 		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
-	} else {
-		pwq = first_pwq(wq);
-	}
+	else
+		pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 
 	/*
 	 * If @work was previously on a different pool, it might still be
@@ -1315,8 +1332,8 @@ retry:
 	 * pwq is determined and locked.  For unbound pools, we could have
 	 * raced with pwq release and it could already be dead.  If its
 	 * refcnt is zero, repeat pwq selection.  Note that pwqs never die
-	 * without another pwq replacing it as the first pwq or while a
-	 * work item is executing on it, so the retying is guaranteed to
+	 * without another pwq replacing it in the numa_pwq_tbl or while
+	 * work items are executing on it, so the retrying is guaranteed to
 	 * make forward-progress.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(!pwq->refcnt)) {
@@ -3614,6 +3631,8 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
 			      struct worker_pool *pool,
 			      struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
 {
+	int node;
+
 	BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
 
 	pwq->pool = pool;
@@ -3640,8 +3659,11 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
 	/* link in @pwq */
 	list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
 
-	if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
+	if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
 		copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
+		for_each_node(node)
+			rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 }
@@ -3761,12 +3783,16 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
 					       struct lock_class_key *key,
 					       const char *lock_name, ...)
 {
+	size_t tbl_size = 0;
 	va_list args;
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	/* allocate wq and format name */
-	wq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
+		tbl_size = wq_numa_tbl_len * sizeof(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[0]);
+
+	wq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq) + tbl_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!wq)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -3994,7 +4020,7 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
 		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
 	else
-		pwq = first_pwq(wq);
+		pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 
 	ret = !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works);
 	rcu_read_unlock_sched();