From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:46:33 +0000 (+1000)
Subject: This does involve additional use of the spin lock in idr.c.  Is this an
X-Git-Tag: next-20110912~1^2~108
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=df9d133f8a28c4c27e109d9bd897fa824b00da74;p=karo-tx-linux.git

This does involve additional use of the spin lock in idr.c.  Is this an
issue?

Also, some error mangling was needed to keep the interface the same.  Does
this matter or can we return -ENOSPC instead of -EBUSY?

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c
index b31a8e3841d7..fa849bdd230f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void __remove(struct device *dev)
 
 	if (oud->disk)
 		put_disk(oud->disk);
-	ida_remove(&osd_minor_ida, oud->minor);
+	ida_simple_remove(&osd_minor_ida, oud->minor);
 
 	kfree(oud);
 }
@@ -403,18 +403,12 @@ static int osd_probe(struct device *dev)
 	if (scsi_device->type != TYPE_OSD)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	do {
-		if (!ida_pre_get(&osd_minor_ida, GFP_KERNEL))
-			return -ENODEV;
-
-		error = ida_get_new(&osd_minor_ida, &minor);
-	} while (error == -EAGAIN);
-
-	if (error)
-		return error;
-	if (minor >= SCSI_OSD_MAX_MINOR) {
-		error = -EBUSY;
-		goto err_retract_minor;
+	minor = ida_simple_get(&osd_minor_ida, 0,
+			       SCSI_OSD_MAX_MINOR, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (minor < 0) {
+		if (minor == -ENOSPC)
+			return -EBUSY;
+		return minor;
 	}
 
 	error = -ENOMEM;
@@ -491,7 +485,7 @@ err_free_osd:
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
 	kfree(oud);
 err_retract_minor:
-	ida_remove(&osd_minor_ida, minor);
+	ida_simple_remove(&osd_minor_ida, minor);
 	return error;
 }