From: Frans Pop Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:39:03 +0000 (+0100) Subject: thermal: Only set passive_delay for forced_passive cooling X-Git-Tag: v2.6.33-rc1~47^2~12^2~1 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e4143b0324a6a468cb00c4341cd20d60cc441252;p=karo-tx-linux.git thermal: Only set passive_delay for forced_passive cooling Setting polling_delay is useless as passive_delay has priority, so the value shown in proc isn't the actual polling delay. It also gives the impression to the user that he can change the polling interval through proc, while in fact he can't. Also, unset passive_delay when the forced passive trip point is unbound to allow polling to be disabled. Signed-off-by: Frans Pop Acked-by: Matthew Garrett Acked-by: Zhang Rui Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c index 310e40ab00b6..663c2fdba775 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ passive_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, cdev); } mutex_unlock(&thermal_list_lock); + if (!tz->passive_delay) + tz->passive_delay = 1000; } else if (!state && tz->forced_passive) { mutex_lock(&thermal_list_lock); list_for_each_entry(cdev, &thermal_cdev_list, node) { @@ -251,17 +253,12 @@ passive_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, cdev); } mutex_unlock(&thermal_list_lock); + tz->passive_delay = 0; } tz->tc1 = 1; tz->tc2 = 1; - if (!tz->passive_delay) - tz->passive_delay = 1000; - - if (!tz->polling_delay) - tz->polling_delay = 10000; - tz->forced_passive = state; thermal_zone_device_update(tz);