From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:53:46 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: udp: ipv4: do not use sk_dst_lock from softirq context
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e47eb5dfb296b;p=linux-beck.git

udp: ipv4: do not use sk_dst_lock from softirq context

Using sk_dst_lock from softirq context is not supported right now.

Instead of adding BH protection everywhere,
udp_sk_rx_dst_set() can instead use xchg(), as suggested
by David.

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Fixes: 975022310233 ("udp: ipv4: must add synchronization in udp_sk_rx_dst_set()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 62c19fdd102d..f140048334ce 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1600,20 +1600,15 @@ static void flush_stack(struct sock **stack, unsigned int count,
 }
 
 /* For TCP sockets, sk_rx_dst is protected by socket lock
- * For UDP, we use sk_dst_lock to guard against concurrent changes.
+ * For UDP, we use xchg() to guard against concurrent changes.
  */
 static void udp_sk_rx_dst_set(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst)
 {
 	struct dst_entry *old;
 
-	spin_lock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
-	old = sk->sk_rx_dst;
-	if (likely(old != dst)) {
-		dst_hold(dst);
-		sk->sk_rx_dst = dst;
-		dst_release(old);
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
+	dst_hold(dst);
+	old = xchg(&sk->sk_rx_dst, dst);
+	dst_release(old);
 }
 
 /*