From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:23:35 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e50aba9aea63b7617887b4d9694184f478731c82;p=linux-beck.git

workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues

Use kmem_cache_alloc_node() with @pool->node instead of
kmem_cache_zalloc() when allocating a pool_workqueue so that it's
allocated on the same node as the associated worker_pool.  As there's
no no kmem_cache_zalloc_node(), move zeroing to init_pwq().

This was suggested by Lai Jiangshan.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c8d047b6c895..07ec57459457 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3626,12 +3626,14 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 }
 
-/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
+/* initialize newly alloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
 static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 		     struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
 	BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
 
+	memset(pwq, 0, sizeof(*pwq));
+
 	pwq->pool = pool;
 	pwq->wq = wq;
 	pwq->flush_color = -1;
@@ -3677,7 +3679,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	if (!pool)
 		return NULL;
 
-	pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+	pwq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL, pool->node);
 	if (!pwq) {
 		put_unbound_pool(pool);
 		return NULL;