From: Viresh Kumar Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:12 +0000 (+0530) Subject: cpufreq: davinci: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e873c5b217634976778bdbf0b88cfded427f545c;p=linux-beck.git cpufreq: davinci: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Cc: Sekhar Nori Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c index 551dd655c6f2..f67196e21fc9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c @@ -140,15 +140,13 @@ static int davinci_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->cur = davinci_getspeed(0); - result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table); + result = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, freq_table); if (result) { - pr_err("%s: cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() failed", + pr_err("%s: cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() failed", __func__); return result; } - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table, policy->cpu); - /* * Time measurement across the target() function yields ~1500-1800us * time taken with no drivers on notification list.