From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:26:52 +0000 (-0500) Subject: sched/debug: Add deadline scheduler bandwidth ratio to /proc/sched_debug X-Git-Tag: next-20160307~39^2~11^2~7 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ef477183d06b0aa41c9e7c02cf5bfec41536e2c4;p=karo-tx-linux.git sched/debug: Add deadline scheduler bandwidth ratio to /proc/sched_debug Playing with SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets, I found that I was unable to create new SCHED_DEADLINE tasks, with the error of EBUSY as if the bandwidth was already used up. I then realized there wa no way to see what bandwidth is used by the runqueues to debug the issue. By adding the dl_bw->bw and dl_bw->total_bw to the output of the deadline info in /proc/sched_debug, this allows us to see what bandwidth has been reserved and where a problem may exist. For example, before the issue we see the ratio of the bandwidth: # cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us 950000 # cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us 1000000 # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[1]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[2]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[3]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[4]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[5]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[6]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[7]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 Note: (950000 / 1000000) << 20 == 996147 After I played with cpusets and hit the issue, the result is now: # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : -104857 dl_rq[1]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[2]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[3]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[4]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : -104857 dl_rq[5]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : -104857 dl_rq[6]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : -104857 dl_rq[7]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : -104857 This shows that there is definitely a problem as we should never have a negative total bandwidth. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Clark Williams Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160222212825.756849091@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index 313c65fe2087..4fbc3bd5ff60 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -566,8 +566,17 @@ void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq) void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) { + struct dl_bw *dl_bw; + SEQ_printf(m, "\ndl_rq[%d]:\n", cpu); SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "dl_nr_running", dl_rq->dl_nr_running); +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + dl_bw = &cpu_rq(cpu)->rd->dl_bw; +#else + dl_bw = &dl_rq->dl_bw; +#endif + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lld\n", "dl_bw->bw", dl_bw->bw); + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lld\n", "dl_bw->total_bw", dl_bw->total_bw); } extern __read_mostly int sched_clock_running;