From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:25:33 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: at86rf230: Allow slow GPIO pins for "rstn"
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f301606934b240fb54d8edf3618a0483e36046fc;p=linux-beck.git

at86rf230: Allow slow GPIO pins for "rstn"

Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so there's
no need to implicitly put such restriction on it by using gpio_set_value
to manipulate it. Replace gpio_set_value to gpio_set_value_cansleep to
fix that.

As a an example of where such restriction might be inconvenient,
consider a hardware design where "rstn" is connected to a pin of I2C/SPI
GPIO expander chip.

Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
index 46d53a6c8cf8..76ba7ecfe142 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
@@ -1715,9 +1715,9 @@ static int at86rf230_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	/* Reset */
 	if (gpio_is_valid(rstn)) {
 		udelay(1);
-		gpio_set_value(rstn, 0);
+		gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 0);
 		udelay(1);
-		gpio_set_value(rstn, 1);
+		gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 1);
 		usleep_range(120, 240);
 	}