From: Dan Williams Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:36:20 +0000 (-0700) Subject: SCSI: libsas: fix sas_discover_devices return code handling X-Git-Tag: v3.5.1~110 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f3d5671d07294ba382ac9ab08177304409a7e548;p=karo-tx-linux.git SCSI: libsas: fix sas_discover_devices return code handling commit b17caa174a7e1fd2e17b26e210d4ee91c4c28b37 upstream. commit 198439e4 [SCSI] libsas: do not set res = 0 in sas_ex_discover_dev() commit 19252de6 [SCSI] libsas: fix wide port hotplug issues The above commits seem to have confused the return value of sas_ex_discover_dev which is non-zero on failure and sas_ex_join_wide_port which just indicates short circuiting discovery on already established ports. The result is random discovery failures depending on configuration. Calls to sas_ex_join_wide_port are the source of the trouble as its return value is errantly assigned to 'res'. Convert it to bool and stop returning its result up the stack. Tested-by: Dan Melnic Reported-by: Dan Melnic Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Reviewed-by: Jack Wang Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index 79f9d559992c..101b28e61c6f 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_end_dev( } /* See if this phy is part of a wide port */ -static int sas_ex_join_wide_port(struct domain_device *parent, int phy_id) +static bool sas_ex_join_wide_port(struct domain_device *parent, int phy_id) { struct ex_phy *phy = &parent->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy_id]; int i; @@ -884,11 +884,11 @@ static int sas_ex_join_wide_port(struct domain_device *parent, int phy_id) sas_port_add_phy(ephy->port, phy->phy); phy->port = ephy->port; phy->phy_state = PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED; - return 0; + return true; } } - return -ENODEV; + return false; } static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_expander( @@ -1030,8 +1030,7 @@ static int sas_ex_discover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id) return res; } - res = sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id); - if (!res) { + if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id)) { SAS_DPRINTK("Attaching ex phy%d to wide port %016llx\n", phy_id, SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr)); return res; @@ -1077,8 +1076,7 @@ static int sas_ex_discover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id) if (SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)) { ex->ex_phy[i].phy_state= PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED; - res = sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, i); - if (!res) + if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, i)) SAS_DPRINTK("Attaching ex phy%d to wide port %016llx\n", i, SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr)); @@ -1943,32 +1941,20 @@ static int sas_discover_new(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id) { struct ex_phy *ex_phy = &dev->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy_id]; struct domain_device *child; - bool found = false; - int res, i; + int res; SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx phy%d new device attached\n", SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id); res = sas_ex_phy_discover(dev, phy_id); if (res) - goto out; - /* to support the wide port inserted */ - for (i = 0; i < dev->ex_dev.num_phys; i++) { - struct ex_phy *ex_phy_temp = &dev->ex_dev.ex_phy[i]; - if (i == phy_id) - continue; - if (SAS_ADDR(ex_phy_temp->attached_sas_addr) == - SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr)) { - found = true; - break; - } - } - if (found) { - sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id); + return res; + + if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id)) return 0; - } + res = sas_ex_discover_devices(dev, phy_id); - if (!res) - goto out; + if (res) + return res; list_for_each_entry(child, &dev->ex_dev.children, siblings) { if (SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr) == SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr)) { @@ -1978,7 +1964,6 @@ static int sas_discover_new(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id) break; } } -out: return res; }