From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 23:42:42 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix potential jiffies overflow in timer_resume()
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.16.28-rc1~399
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f7c09bd972b7111b8c69bf57a189571edd4d4a7d;p=karo-tx-linux.git

[PATCH] x86: fix potential jiffies overflow in timer_resume()

i386 timer_resume is updating jiffies, not jiffies_64.  It looks there is a
potential overflow problem.  And jiffies_64 and wall_jiffies should be
protected by xtime_lock.

Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/time.c b/arch/i386/kernel/time.c
index a14d594bfbeb..9d3074759856 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/time.c
@@ -412,9 +412,9 @@ static int timer_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
 	write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
 	xtime.tv_sec = sec;
 	xtime.tv_nsec = 0;
-	write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
-	jiffies += sleep_length;
+	jiffies_64 += sleep_length;
 	wall_jiffies += sleep_length;
+	write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
 	if (last_timer->resume)
 		last_timer->resume();
 	cur_timer = last_timer;