Arnd Bergmann [Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:44:12 +0000 (17:44 +0100)]
thermal: allow u8500-thermal driver to be a module
When the thermal subsystem is a loadable module, the u8500 driver
fails to build:
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `db8500_thermal_probe':
db8500_thermal.c:(.text+0x96c): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_register'
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `db8500_thermal_work':
db8500_thermal.c:(.text+0xab4): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_update'
This changes the symbol to a tristate, so Kconfig can track the
dependency correctly.
Arnd Bergmann [Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:44:11 +0000 (17:44 +0100)]
thermal: allow spear-thermal driver to be a module
When the thermal subsystem is a loadable module, the spear driver
fails to build:
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `spear_thermal_exit':
spear_thermal.c:(.text+0xf8): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_unregister'
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `spear_thermal_probe':
spear_thermal.c:(.text+0x230): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_register'
This changes the symbol to a tristate, so Kconfig can track the
dependency correctly.
Arnd Bergmann [Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:44:10 +0000 (17:44 +0100)]
thermal: spear: use __maybe_unused for PM functions
The spear thermal driver hides its suspend/resume function conditionally
based on CONFIG_PM, but references them based on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, so
we get a warning if the former is set but the latter is not:
thermal/spear_thermal.c:58:12: warning: 'spear_thermal_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
thermal/spear_thermal.c:75:12: warning: 'spear_thermal_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
This removes the #ifdef and instead uses a __maybe_uninitialized
annotation to avoid the warning and improve compile-time coverage.
This patch enables to use thermal-zone on DT if it was calles as
"renesas,rcar-thermal-gen2".
Previous style (= non thermal-zone) is still supported by
"renesas,rcar-thermal" to keep compatibility for "git bisect".
* pm-cpufreq: (22 commits)
cpufreq: governor: Drop pointless goto from cpufreq_governor_init()
cpufreq: governor: Rename skip_work to work_count
cpufreq: governor: Symmetrize cpu_dbs_info initialization and cleanup
cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures
cpufreq: governor: Simplify cpufreq_governor_limits()
cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu()
cpufreq: governor: Rename cpu_common_dbs_info to policy_dbs_info
cpufreq: governor: Drop the gov pointer from struct dbs_data
cpufreq: governor: Rework cpufreq_governor_dbs()
cpufreq: governor: Rename some data types and variables
cpufreq: governor: Put governor structure into common_dbs_data
cpufreq: governor: Avoid passing dbs_data pointers around unnecessarily
cpufreq: governor: Use common mutex for dbs_data protection
cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
cpufreq: Add a mechanism for registering utilization update callbacks
cpufreq: powernv: Replace pr_info with trace print for throttle event
cpufreq: powernv/tracing: Add powernv_throttle tracepoint
cpufreq: powernv: Remove cpu_to_chip_id() from hot-path
cpufreq: powernv: Hot-plug safe the kworker thread
...
cpufreq: governor: Symmetrize cpu_dbs_info initialization and cleanup
Make the initialization of struct cpu_dbs_info objects in
alloc_policy_dbs_info() and the code that cleans them up in
free_policy_dbs_info() more symmetrical. In particular,
set/clear the update_util.func field in those functions along
with the policy_dbs field.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures
The struct policy_dbs_info objects representing per-policy governor
data are not accessible directly from the corresponding policy
objects. To access them, one has to get a pointer to the
struct cpu_dbs_info of policy->cpu and use the policy_dbs field of
that which isn't really straightforward.
To address that rearrange the governor data structures so the
governor_data pointer in struct cpufreq_policy will point to
struct policy_dbs_info (instead of struct dbs_data) and that will
contain a pointer to struct dbs_data.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Use the observation that cpufreq_governor_limits() doesn't have to
get to the policy object it wants to manipulate by walking the
reference chain cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, as the final pointer is
actually equal to its argument, and make it access the policy
object directy via its argument.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu()
Since policy->cpu is always passed as the second argument to
dbs_check_cpu(), it is not really necessary to pass it, because
the function can obtain that value via its first argument just fine.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Rename cpu_common_dbs_info to policy_dbs_info
The struct cpu_common_dbs_info structure represents the per-policy
part of the governor data (for the ondemand and conservative
governors), but its name doesn't reflect its purpose.
Rename it to struct policy_dbs_info and rename variables related to
it accordingly.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Drop the gov pointer from struct dbs_data
Since it is possible to obtain a pointer to struct dbs_governor
from a pointer to the struct governor embedded in it with the help
of container_of(), the additional gov pointer in struct dbs_data
isn't really necessary.
Drop that pointer and make the code using it reach the dbs_governor
object via policy->governor.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Since it is possible to obtain a pointer to struct dbs_governor
from a pointer to the struct governor embedded in it via
container_of(), the second argument of cpufreq_governor_init()
is not necessary. Accordingly, cpufreq_governor_dbs() doesn't
need its second argument either and the ->governor callbacks
for both the ondemand and conservative governors may be set
to cpufreq_governor_dbs() directly. Make that happen.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Rename some data types and variables
The ondemand and conservative governors are represented by
struct common_dbs_data whose name doesn't reflect the purpose it
is used for, so rename it to struct dbs_governor and rename
variables of that type accordingly.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Put governor structure into common_dbs_data
For the ondemand and conservative governors (generally, governors
that use the common code in cpufreq_governor.c), there are two static
data structures representing the governor, the struct governor
structure (the interface to the cpufreq core) and the struct
common_dbs_data one (the interface to the cpufreq_governor.c code).
There's no fundamental reason why those two structures have to be
separate. Moreover, if the struct governor one is included into
struct common_dbs_data, it will be possible to reach the latter from
the policy via its policy->governor pointer, so it won't be necessary
to pass a separate pointer to it around. For this reason, embed
struct governor in struct common_dbs_data.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Avoid passing dbs_data pointers around unnecessarily
Do not pass struct dbs_data pointers to the family of functions
implementing governor operations in cpufreq_governor.c as they can
take that pointer from policy->governor by themselves.
The cpufreq_governor_init() case is slightly more complicated, since
policy->governor may be NULL when it is invoked, but then it can reach
the pointer in question via its cdata argument just fine.
While at it, rework cpufreq_governor_dbs() to avoid a pointless
policy_governor check in the CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT case.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
projects / karo-tx-linux.git / log