Avoid duplicating the same piece of code several times by separating
the watemark vfunc setup from the init_clock_gating vfunc setup on PCH
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:14:09 +0000 (16:14 +0200)]
drm/i915: Enable watermarks for BDW
We forgot to intialize the watermark vfuncs for BDW, and hence the
watermarks were never updated.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:14:08 +0000 (16:14 +0200)]
drm/i915: Fix watermark code for BDW
Looks like I forgot to update the ILK/SNB/IVB watermark patches to deal
with BDW. Add the relevant BDW checks to make sure we take the HSW
codepaths on BDW as well.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
There are many cases where this feature does not improve performance or even
reduces it.
For example, here are the results from tests that I've run using 3.12.6 on one
Intel Xeon W3565 and one i7 920 connected by ixgbe adapters. The results are
from the Xeon, but they're similar on the i7. All numbers report the
mean±stddev over 10 runs of 10s.
1) latency tests similar to what is described in "c6e1a0d net: Allow no-cache
copy from user on transmit"
There is no statistically significant difference between tx-nocache-copy
on/off.
nic irqs spread out (one queue per cpu)
200x netperf -r 1400,1
tx-nocache-copy off
692000±1000 tps
50/90/95/99% latency (us): 275±2/643.8±0.4/799±1/2474.4±0.3
tx-nocache-copy on
693000±1000 tps
50/90/95/99% latency (us): 274±1/644.1±0.7/800±2/2474.5±0.7
200x netperf -r 14000,14000
tx-nocache-copy off
86450±80 tps
50/90/95/99% latency (us): 334.37±0.02/838±1/2100±20/3990±40
tx-nocache-copy on
86110±60 tps
50/90/95/99% latency (us): 334.28±0.01/837±2/2110±20/3990±20
2) single stream throughput tests
tx-nocache-copy leads to higher service demand
nic irqs and netperf on cpu0 (1x netperf -T0,0 -t omni -- -d send)
tx-nocache-copy off 9402±5 9.4±0.2 0.80±0.01
tx-nocache-copy on 9403±3 9.85±0.04 0.838±0.004
nic irqs on cpu0, netperf on cpu1 (1x netperf -T1,1 -t omni -- -d send)
tx-nocache-copy off 9401±5 5.83±0.03 5.0±0.1 0.923±0.007
tx-nocache-copy on 9404±2 5.74±0.03 5.523±0.009 0.958±0.002
As a second example, here are some results from Eric Dumazet with latest
net-next.
tx-nocache-copy also leads to higher service demand
(cpu is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5660 @ 2.80GHz)
lpq83:~# ./ethtool -K eth0 tx-nocache-copy on
lpq83:~# perf stat ./netperf -H lpq84 -c
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to lpq84.prod.google.com () port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % U us/KB us/KB
lpq83:~# ./ethtool -K eth0 tx-nocache-copy off
lpq83:~# perf stat ./netperf -H lpq84 -c
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to lpq84.prod.google.com () port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % U us/KB us/KB
Erik Hugne [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:51:36 +0000 (15:51 -0500)]
tipc: correctly unlink packets from deferred packet queue
When we pull a received packet from a link's 'deferred packets' queue
for processing, its 'next' pointer is not cleared, and still refers to
the next packet in that queue, if any. This is incorrect, but caused
no harm before commit 40ba3cdf542a469aaa9083fa041656e59b109b90 ("tipc:
message reassembly using fragment chain") was introduced. After that
commit, it may sometimes lead to the following oops:
This happens when the last fragment of a message has passed through the
the receiving link's 'deferred packets' queue, and at least one other
packet was added to that queue while it was there. After the fragment
chain with the complete message has been successfully delivered to the
receiving socket, it is released. Since 'next' pointer of the last
fragment in the released chain now is non-NULL, we get the crash shown
above.
We fix this by clearing the 'next' pointer of all received packets,
including those being pulled from the 'deferred' queue, before they
undergo any further processing.
Fixes: 40ba3cdf542a4 ("tipc: message reassembly using fragment chain") Signed-off-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com> Reported-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Jiri Pirko [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:55:45 +0000 (15:55 +0100)]
ipv4: loopback device: ignore value changes after device is upped
When lo is brought up, new ifa is created. Then, devconf and neigh values
bitfield should be set so later changes of default values would not
affect lo values.
Note that the same behaviour is in ipv6. Also note that this is likely
not an issue in many distros (for example Fedora 19) because userspace
sets address to lo manually before bringing it up.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
FX Le Bail [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:57:27 +0000 (14:57 +0100)]
IPv6: add the option to use anycast addresses as source addresses in echo reply
This change allows to follow a recommandation of RFC4942.
- Add "anycast_src_echo_reply" sysctl to control the use of anycast addresses
as source addresses for ICMPv6 echo reply. This sysctl is false by default
to preserve existing behavior.
- Add inline check ipv6_anycast_destination().
- Use them in icmpv6_echo_reply().
2.1.6. Anycast Traffic Identification and Security
[...]
To avoid exposing knowledge about the internal structure of the
network, it is recommended that anycast servers now take advantage of
the ability to return responses with the anycast address as the
source address if possible.
Signed-off-by: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail@yahoo.com> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
projects / karo-tx-linux.git / log