Alan Stern [Tue, 6 Dec 2011 22:24:52 +0000 (23:24 +0100)]
PM / Driver core: leave runtime PM enabled during system shutdown
Disabling all runtime PM during system shutdown turns out not to be a
good idea, because some devices may need to be woken up from a
low-power state at that time.
The whole point of disabling runtime PM for system shutdown was to
prevent untimely runtime-suspend method calls. This patch (as1504)
accomplishes the same result by incrementing the usage count for each
device and waiting for ongoing runtime-PM callbacks to finish. This
is what we already do during system suspend and hibernation, which
makes sense since the shutdown method is pretty much a legacy analog
of the pm->poweroff method.
This fixes a recent regression on some OMAP systems introduced by
commit af8db1508f2c9f3b6e633e2d2d906c6557c617f9 (PM / driver core:
disable device's runtime PM during shutdown).
Reported-and-tested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
PM / Sleep: Recommend [un]lock_system_sleep() over using pm_mutex directly
Update the documentation to explain the perils of directly using
mutex_[un]lock(&pm_mutex) and recommend the usage of the safe
APIs [un]lock_system_sleep() instead.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
PM / Sleep: Replace mutex_[un]lock(&pm_mutex) with [un]lock_system_sleep()
Using [un]lock_system_sleep() is safer than directly using mutex_[un]lock()
on 'pm_mutex', since the latter could lead to freezing failures. Hence convert
all the present users of mutex_[un]lock(&pm_mutex) to use these safe APIs
instead.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
The [un]lock_system_sleep() APIs were originally introduced to mutually
exclude memory hotplug and hibernation.
Directly using mutex_lock(&pm_mutex) to achieve mutual exclusion with
suspend or hibernation code can lead to freezing failures. However, the
APIs [un]lock_system_sleep() can be safely used to achieve the same,
without causing freezing failures.
So, since it would be beneficial to modify all the existing users of
mutex_lock(&pm_mutex) (in all parts of the kernel), so that they use these
safe APIs intead, make these APIs generic by removing the restriction that
they work only when CONFIG_HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS is set. Moreover, that
restriction didn't buy us anything anyway.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Various bugfixes for caif_shmcore.c:
- fix deadlocks due to improper usage of spin-lock
- add missing spin-lock init
- don't call dev_kfree_skb() with irqs disabled,
use dev_kfree_skb_irq() instead.
- fix potential skb null pointer de-reference.
Squashed original patches from:
Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Durga Prasada Rao BATHINA <durgaprasadarao.b@stericcson.com>
Arun Murthy <arun.murthy@stericsson.com>
Bibek Basu <bibek.basu@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Christian Auby [Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:15:41 +0000 (12:15 +0000)]
caif-hsi: Remove wake line modification when flushing FIFO
Raising wake before flushing FIFO and lowering it after caused a
spike on AC wake that were sometimes detected and acted upon by the
modem. Fixed this by remove wake line modification when flushing FIFO.
Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
PM / Sleep: Use the freezer_count() functions in [un]lock_system_sleep() APIs
Now that freezer_count() and freezer_do_not_count() don't have the restriction
that they are effective only when called by userspace processes, use
them in lock_system_sleep() and unlock_system_sleep() instead of open-coding
their parts.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
PM / Freezer: Remove the "userspace only" constraint from freezer[_do_not]_count()
At present, the functions freezer_count() and freezer_do_not_count()
impose the restriction that they are effective only for userspace processes.
However, now, these functions have found more utility than originally
intended by the commit which introduced it: ba96a0c8 (freezer:
fix vfork problem). And moreover, even the vfork issue actually does not
need the above restriction in these functions.
So, modify these functions to make them work even for kernel threads, so
that they can be used at other places in the kernel, where the userspace
restriction doesn't apply.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
PM / Domains: Fix default system suspend/resume operations
Commit d23b9b00cdde5c93b914a172cecd57d5625fcd04 (PM / Domains: Rework
system suspend callback routines (v2)) broke the system suspend and
resume handling by devices belonging to generic PM domains, because
it used freeze/thaw callbacks instead of suspend/resume ones and
didn't initialize device callbacks for system suspend/resume
properly at all. Fix those problems.
projects / karo-tx-linux.git / log