]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - linux-beck.git/log
linux-beck.git
11 years agocpufreq: exynos4210: Use the common clock framework to set APLL clock rate
Lukasz Majewski [Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:08:43 +0000 (14:08 +0200)]
cpufreq: exynos4210: Use the common clock framework to set APLL clock rate

In the exynos4210_set_apll() function, the APLL frequency is set with
direct register manipulation.

Such approach is not allowed in the common clock framework. The frequency
is changed, but the corresponding clock value is not updated. This causes
wrong frequency read from cpufreq's cpuinfo_cur_freq sysfs attribute.

Also direct manipulation with PLL's S parameter has been removed. It is
already done at PLL35xx code.

Tested at:
- Exynos4210 - Trats board (linux 3.12-rc4)

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos4x12: Use the common clock framework to set APLL clock rate
Lukasz Majewski [Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:08:42 +0000 (14:08 +0200)]
cpufreq: exynos4x12: Use the common clock framework to set APLL clock rate

In the exynos4x12_set_apll() function, the APLL frequency is set with
direct register manipulation.

Such approach is not allowed in the common clock framework. The frequency
is changed, but the corresponding clock value is not updated. This causes
wrong frequency read from cpufreq's cpuinfo_cur_freq sysfs attribute.

Also direct manipulation with PLL's S parameter has been removed. It is
already done at PLL35xx code.

Tested at:
- Exynos4412 - Trats2 board (linux 3.12-rc4)

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: Detect spurious invocations of update_policy_cpu()
Srivatsa S. Bhat [Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:59:09 +0000 (17:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: Detect spurious invocations of update_policy_cpu()

The function update_policy_cpu() is expected to be called when the policy->cpu
of a cpufreq policy is to be changed: ie., the new CPU nominated to become the
policy->cpu is different from the old one.

Print a warning if it is invoked with new_cpu == old_cpu, since such an
invocation might hint at a faulty logic in the caller.

Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac64: enable cpufreq on iMac G5 (iSight) model
Aaro Koskinen [Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:44:33 +0000 (23:44 +0300)]
cpufreq: pmac64: enable cpufreq on iMac G5 (iSight) model

Enable cpufreq on iMac G5 (iSight) model. Tested with the 2.1 GHz version.

Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac64: provide cpufreq transition latency for older G5 models
Aaro Koskinen [Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:44:32 +0000 (23:44 +0300)]
cpufreq: pmac64: provide cpufreq transition latency for older G5 models

Currently cpufreq ondemand governor cannot used on older G5 models,
because the transition latency is set to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL. Provide a
value based on a measurement on Xserve G5, which happens to be also the
highest allowed latency.

Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac64: speed up frequency switch
Aaro Koskinen [Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:44:31 +0000 (23:44 +0300)]
cpufreq: pmac64: speed up frequency switch

Some functions on switch path use msleep() which is inaccurate, and
depends on HZ. With HZ=100 msleep(1) takes actually over ten times longer.
Using usleep_range() we get more accurate sleeps.

I measured the "pfunc_slewing_done" polling to take 300us at max (on
2.3GHz dual-processor Xserve G5), so using 500us sleep there should
be fine.

With the patch, g5_switch_freq() duration drops from ~50ms to ~10ms on
Xserve with HZ=100.

Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: Enable Midway/ECX-2000
Mark Langsdorf [Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:30:24 +0000 (10:30 -0500)]
cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: Enable Midway/ECX-2000

Calxeda's new ECX-2000 part uses the same cpufreq interface as highbank,
so add it to the driver's compatibility list.

This is a minor change that can safely be applied to the 3.10 and 3.11
stable trees.

Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agoexynos-cpufreq: fix false return check from "regulator_set_voltage"
Manish Badarkhe [Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:13:37 +0000 (20:43 +0530)]
exynos-cpufreq: fix false return check from "regulator_set_voltage"

Currently, code checks false return value from "regulator_set_voltage"
to show failure message. Modify the code to check proper return
value from "regulator_set_voltage".

Signed-off-by: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agospeedstep-centrino: Remove unnecessary braces
Evgeny Kapaev [Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:42:52 +0000 (21:42 +0400)]
speedstep-centrino: Remove unnecessary braces

As per coding style, braces {} are not necessary for single statement block

Signed-off-by: Evgeny Kapaev <orener300@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agoacpi-cpufreq: Add comment under ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO case
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:58:10 +0000 (23:58 +0200)]
acpi-cpufreq: Add comment under ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO case

policy->cur is now set by cpufreq core when cpufreq_driver->get() is defined and
so drivers aren't required to set it. When space_id is ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO
for acpi cpufreq driver it doesn't set ->get to a valid function pointer and so
policy->cur is required to be set by driver.

This is already followed in acpi-cpufreq driver. This patch adds a comment
describing why we need to set policy->cur from driver.

Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: arm-big-little: use clk_get instead of clk_get_sys
Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:52:39 +0000 (14:52 +0100)]
cpufreq: arm-big-little: use clk_get instead of clk_get_sys

Currently clk_get_sys is used with cpu-cluster.<n> as the device id
which is incorrect. It should be connection/consumer ID instead.

It is possible to specify input clock in the cpu device node along
with the optional clock-name. clk_get_sys can't handle that.

This patch replaces clk_get_sys with clk_get to extend support for
clocks specified in the device tree cpu node.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos: Show a list of available frequencies
Jungseok Lee [Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:31:13 +0000 (08:31 +0900)]
cpufreq: exynos: Show a list of available frequencies

This patch adds freq_attr to show a list of exynos5440 scaling
available frequencies through sysfs. Common exynos driver already
supports this attribute.

Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: Fix build breakage after "Expose frequency table"
Viresh Kumar [Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:16:05 +0000 (22:16 +0200)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: Fix build breakage after "Expose frequency table"

Fix build breakage introduced by commit 22c8b4f (cpufreq: sa11x0:
Expose frequency table).

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:12:11 +0000 (20:42 +0530)]
cpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: spear: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:12:10 +0000 (20:42 +0530)]
cpufreq: spear: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:12:09 +0000 (20:42 +0530)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s5pv210: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:23 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: s5pv210: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:22 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac64: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:21 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: pmac64: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac32: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:20 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: pmac32: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pasemi: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:19 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: pasemi: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: omap: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:18 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: omap: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

This also rearranges the code a bit to make it more sensible. Also removes some
unnecessary checks.

Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: maple: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:17 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: maple: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: loongson2: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:16 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: loongson2: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here. This driver wasn't setting transition_latency and so is getting set to 0
by default. Lets mark it explicitly by calling the generic routine with
transition_latency as 0.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:15 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: imx6q: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:14 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: imx6q: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:13 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: exynos: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: dbx500: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:12 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: dbx500: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: davinci: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:11 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: davinci: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cris: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:10 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: cris: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: use cpufreq_generic_init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:09 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:08 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE

CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE will be always enabled when cpufreq framework is used, as
cpufreq core depends on it. So, we don't need this CONFIG option anymore as it
is not configurable. Remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE and update its users.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: create cpufreq_generic_init() routine
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:07 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: create cpufreq_generic_init() routine

Many CPUFreq drivers for SMP system (where all cores share same clock lines), do
similar stuff in their ->init() part.

This patch creates a generic routine in cpufreq core which can be used by these
so that we can remove some redundant code.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: unicore2: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:06 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: unicore2: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: tegra: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:05 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: tegra: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: speedstep: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:04 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: speedstep: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: spear: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:03 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: spear: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sh: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:02 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: sh: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sc520_freq: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:01 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: sc520_freq: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:00 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s5pv210: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:59 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s5pv210: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s3c: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:58 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s3c: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pxa: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:57 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pxa: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ppc: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:56 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ppc: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: powernow: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:55 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: powernow: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:54 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pmac: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pcc: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:53 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pcc: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: p4: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:52 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: p4: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: omap: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:51 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: omap: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: maple: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:50 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: maple: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: loongson2: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:49 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: loongson2: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: longhaul: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:48 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: longhaul: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:47 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:46 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init(). And so we don't need to set policy->cur from driver anymore.

Over that it sets policy->min and max correctly. They were earlier set to
current frequency of CPU but they should be set to max and min freq of cpu.

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: imx6q: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:45 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: imx6q: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ia64-acpi: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:44 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ia64-acpi: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: gx: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:43 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: gx: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:42 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: exynos: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: elanfreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:41 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: elanfreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: e_powersaver: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:40 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: e_powersaver: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: dbx500: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:39 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: dbx500: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: davinci: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:38 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: davinci: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cris: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:37 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cris: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: nforce2: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:36 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: nforce2: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cpu0: don't initialize part of policy set by core too
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:35 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cpu0: don't initialize part of policy set by core too

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: blackfin: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:34 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: blackfin: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: at32ap: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:33 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: at32ap: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize part of policy is set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:32 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize part of policy is set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:31 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:30 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()

Almost all drivers set policy->cur with current CPU frequency in their ->init()
part. This can be done for all of them at core level and so they wouldn't need
to do it.

This patch adds supporting code in cpufreq core for calling get() after we have
called init() for a policy.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: tegra: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:29 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: tegra: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the Tegra driver.

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: speedstep: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:28 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: speedstep: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the speedstep driver.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: spear: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:27 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: spear: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the spear driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sparc: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:26 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sparc: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sparc driver.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sh: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:25 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sh: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sh driver.

Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sc520: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:24 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sc520: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sc520 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:23 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sa11x0 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s5pv210: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:22 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s5pv210: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the s5pv210 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s3cx4xx: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:21 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s3cx4xx: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the s3cx4xx driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pxa: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:20 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pxa: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the PXA driver.

Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ppc_cbe: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:19 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ppc_cbe: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the ppc_cbe driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ppc-corenet: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:18 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ppc-corenet: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the ppc-corenet driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: powernow: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:17 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: powernow: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the powernow driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:16 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pmac: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the pmac driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pasemi: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:15 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pasemi: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the pasemi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: p4-clockmod: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:14 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: p4-clockmod: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the p4-clockmod driver.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: omap: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:13 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: omap: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the OMAP driver.

Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: maple: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:12 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: maple: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the maple driver.

Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: loongson2: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:11 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: loongson2: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the loongson2 driver.

Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: longhaul: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:10 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: longhaul: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the longhaul driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:09 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the kirkwood driver.

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: imx6q: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:08 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: imx6q: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines for in the imx6q driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ia64-acpi: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:07 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ia64-acpi: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the ia64-acpi driver.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:06 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: exynos: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the exynos driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: elanfreq: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:05 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: elanfreq: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the elanfreq driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: e_powersaver: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:04 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: e_powersaver: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the e_powersaver driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: dbx500: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:03 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: dbx500: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines for in the dbx500 driver.

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: davinci: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:02 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: davinci: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the davinci driver.

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cris: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:01 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cris: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the cris driver.

Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:00 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the cpufreq-cpu0 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>