Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:49 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
microblaze: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:49 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
microblaze: fix signal masking
There are a couple of problems with the current signal code,
1. If we failed to setup the signal stack frame then we should not be
masking any signals.
2. ka->sa.sa_mask is only added to the current blocked signals list if
SA_NODEFER is set in ka->sa.sa_flags. If we successfully setup the
signal frame and are going to run the handler then we must honour
sa_mask.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:48 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
microblaze: no need to reset handler if SA_ONESHOT
get_signal_to_deliver() already resets the signal handler if SA_ONESHOT is
set in ka->sa.sa_flags, there's no need to do it again in handle_signal().
Furthermore, because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which is a copy
of sighand->action[]) instead of sighand->action[] the original code
actually had no effect on signal delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:48 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
microblaze: don't reimplement force_sigsegv()
Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call it.
This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which
is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the code was to
modify sighand->action[] directly.
As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on signal
delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:47 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
ia64: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The use of defined() on arrays and hashes has been deprecated since perl
5.6, but until 5.17.6 it only warned on lexicals, not package globals.
Signed-off-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Alex Shi [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:46 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
percpu: remove percpu_xxx() functions
There are no percpu_xxx callers remaining
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Alex Shi [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:45 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs
percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
for further code clean up.
And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Alex Shi [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:45 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
x86: change percpu_read_stable() to this_cpu_read_stable()
It has no function change. It's a preparation for percpu_xxx serial
function change.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Alex Shi [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:44 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
x86: use this_cpu_xxx to replace percpu_xxx funcs
Since percpu_xxx() serial functions are duplicate with this_cpu_xxx().
Removing percpu_xxx() definition and replacing them by this_cpu_xxx() in
code.
And further more, as Christoph Lameter's requirement, I try to use
__this_cpu_xx to replace this_cpu_xxx if it is in preempt safe scenario.
The preempt safe scenarios include:
1, in irq/softirq/nmi handler
2, protected by preempt_disable
3, protected by spin_lock
4, if the code context imply that it is preempt safe, like the code is
follows or be followed a preempt safe code.
BTW, In fact, this_cpu_xxx are same as __this_cpu_xxx since all funcs
implement in a single instruction for x86 machine. But it maybe other
platforms' performance.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h: fix smp_processor_id's need for this_cpu_read] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:43 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
cris: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
It's showing up as regressions; disabling it very likely just papers
over an underlying issue, but time is running out for 2.6.28, lets get
back to this for 2.6.29
Many years has passed since 2008, so it seems ok to remove whole `#if 0' block.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com> Cc: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:42 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
mn10300: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:42 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
m68k: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:41 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
m32r: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:41 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
avr32: use block_sigmask()
Use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f ("signal:
add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which
centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully
delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across
architectures.
In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper
function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:40 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
avr32: don't mask signals in the error path
The current handle_signal() implementation is broken - it will mask
signals if we fail to setup the signal stack frame, which isn't the
desired behaviour, we should only be masking signals if we succeed in
setting up the stack frame. It looks like this code was copied from the
old (broken) arm implementation but wasn't updated when the arm code was
fixed in commit a6c61e9dfdd0 ("[ARM] 3168/1: Update ARM signal delivery
and masking").
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
arch/x86/platform/iris/iris.c: register a platform device and a platform driver
This makes the iris driver use the platform API, so it is properly exposed
in /sys.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove commented-out code, add missing space to printk, clean up code layout] Signed-off-by: Shérab <Sebastien.Hinderer@ens-lyon.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tao Guo [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:37 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
umem: fix up unplugging
Fix a regression introduced by 7eaceaccab5f40 ("block: remove per-queue
plugging"). In that patch, Jens removed the whole mm_unplug_device()
function, which used to be the trigger to make umem start to work.
We need to implement unplugging to make umem start to work, or I/O
will never be triggered.
Signed-off-by: Tao Guo <Tao.Guo@emc.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Peter Feuerer [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:36 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
acerhdf: lowered default temp fanon/fanoff values
Due to new supported hardware, of which the actual temperature limits of
processor, harddisk and other components are unknown, it feels safer with
lower fanon / fanoff settings.
It won't change much for most people, already using acerhdf, as they use
their own fanon/fanoff variable settings when loading the module.
Furthermore seems like kernel and userspace tools have been improved to
work more efficient and netbooks don't get so hot anymore.
Signed-off-by: Peter Feuerer <peter@piie.net> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
projects / karo-tx-linux.git / log