Timur Tabi [Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:59:37 +0000 (12:59 -0500)]
ASoC: improve asynchronous mode support in the fsl_ssi driver
The Freescale SSI audio controller supports "synchronous" and "asynchronous"
modes. In synchronous mode, playback and capture use the same input clock,
so sample rates must be the same during simultaneous playback and capture.
Unfortunately, the code which supports asynchronous mode is just broken in
various ways. In particular, it was constraining sample sizes as well as
the sample rate.
The fix also allows us to simplify the code by eliminating the 'asynchronous',
'playback', and 'capture' variables that were used to keep track of playback
and capture streams.
Unfortunately, it turns out that simulataneous playback and record does not
actually work on the only platform that supports asynchronous mode: the
Freescale P1022DS reference board. If a second stream is started, the SSI
grinds to halt for both streams. This is true even if the P1022 is configured
for synchronous mode, so it's likely a hardware problem that needs to be
worked around.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com> Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Stephen Rothwell [Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:07:15 +0000 (17:07 +1000)]
encrypted-keys: IS_ERR need include/err.h
Fixes this build error:
security/keys/encrypted-keys/masterkey_trusted.c: In function 'request_trusted_key':
security/keys/encrypted-keys/masterkey_trusted.c:35:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IS_ERR'
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
On x86-64, they were just wasteful: with the explicitly added (now
unnecessary) padding, the size of the alternatives structure was 16
bytes, and an alignment of 8 bytes didn't hurt much.
However, it was still silly, since the natural size and alignment for
the structure is actually just 12 bytes, 4-byte aligned since commit 59e97e4d6fbc ("x86: Make alternative instruction pointers relative").
So removing the padding, and removing the extra alignment is just a good
idea.
On x86-32, the alignment of 4 bytes was correct, but was incorrectly
hardcoded as 8 bytes in <asm/alternative-asm.h>. That header file had
used to be an x86-64 only header file, but various unification efforts
have made it be used for x86-32 too (ie the unification of rwlock and
rwsem).
That in turn caused x86-32 boot failures, because the extra alignment
would result in random zero-filled words in the altinstructions section,
causing oopses early at boot when doing alternative instruction
replacement.
So just remove all the alignment noise entirely. It's wrong, and it's
unnecessary. The section itself is already properly aligned by the
linker scripts, and all additions to the section had better be of the
proper 12-byte format, keeping it aligned. So if the align directive
were to ever make a difference, that would be an indication of a serious
bug to begin with.
Reported-by: Werner Landgraf <w.landgraf@ru.r> Acked-by: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Merge branch 'bugfixes' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs
* 'bugfixes' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs:
nfs: Do not allow multiple mounts on same mountpoint when using -o noac
NFS: Fix a typo in nfs_flush_multi
NFSv4: renewd needs to be able to handle the NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN error
NFSv4: The NFSv4.0 client must send RENEW calls if it holds a delegation
NFSv4: nfs4_proc_renew should be declared static
NFSv4: nfs4_proc_async_renew should use a GFP_NOFS allocation
generic_check_addressable can't deal with hfsplus's larger than page
size allocation blocks, so simply opencode the checks that we actually
need in hfsplus_fill_super.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com> Reported-by: Pavel Ivanov <paivanof@gmail.com> Tested-by: Pavel Ivanov <paivanof@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
hfsplus: Fix kfree of wrong pointers in hfsplus_fill_super() error path
Commit 6596528e391a ("hfsplus: ensure bio requests are not smaller than
the hardware sectors") changed the pointers used for volume header
allocations but failed to free the correct pointers in the error path
path of hfsplus_fill_super() and hfsplus_read_wrapper.
The second hunk came from a separate patch by Pavel Ivanov.
Reported-by: Pavel Ivanov <paivanof@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Mark Rutland [Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:03:17 +0000 (18:03 +0100)]
ARM: 7023/1: L2x0: Add interrupts property to OF binding
Following the discussion here:
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2011-August/007301.html
The L2x0 L2 Cache Controllers support a combined interrupt line
which can be used for several events (e.g. read/write/parity errors on
tag/data RAM, event counter increment/overflow). Unfortunately the
OF binding added in c519ecf2 ("ARM: 7009/1: l2x0: Add OF based
initialization") does not represent the interrupt.
This patch adds an "interrupts" property to the L2x0 OF binding,
representing the combined interrupt line.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Barry Song [Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:20:01 +0000 (03:20 +0100)]
ARM: 7090/1: CACHE-L2X0: filter start address can be 0 and is often 0
this patch fixes the error in Rob Herring's
ARM: 7009/1: l2x0: Add OF based initialization
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg131123.html
it has been in rmk/for-next with commit 41c86ff5b
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Barry Song [Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:30:34 +0000 (10:30 +0100)]
ARM: 7089/1: L2X0: add explicit cpu_relax() for busy wait loop
using cpu_relax in busy loops is a well-known idiom in the kernel.
It's more for documentation purposes than technically needed here.
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>