Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:43 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
cris: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
It's showing up as regressions; disabling it very likely just papers
over an underlying issue, but time is running out for 2.6.28, lets get
back to this for 2.6.29
Many years has passed since 2008, so it seems ok to remove whole `#if 0' block.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com> Cc: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:42 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
mn10300: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:42 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
m68k: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:41 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
m32r: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:41 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
avr32: use block_sigmask()
Use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f ("signal:
add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which
centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully
delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across
architectures.
In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper
function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Matt Fleming [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:40 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
avr32: don't mask signals in the error path
The current handle_signal() implementation is broken - it will mask
signals if we fail to setup the signal stack frame, which isn't the
desired behaviour, we should only be masking signals if we succeed in
setting up the stack frame. It looks like this code was copied from the
old (broken) arm implementation but wasn't updated when the arm code was
fixed in commit a6c61e9dfdd0 ("[ARM] 3168/1: Update ARM signal delivery
and masking").
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
arch/x86/platform/iris/iris.c: register a platform device and a platform driver
This makes the iris driver use the platform API, so it is properly exposed
in /sys.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove commented-out code, add missing space to printk, clean up code layout] Signed-off-by: Shérab <Sebastien.Hinderer@ens-lyon.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tao Guo [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:37 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
umem: fix up unplugging
Fix a regression introduced by 7eaceaccab5f40 ("block: remove per-queue
plugging"). In that patch, Jens removed the whole mm_unplug_device()
function, which used to be the trigger to make umem start to work.
We need to implement unplugging to make umem start to work, or I/O
will never be triggered.
Signed-off-by: Tao Guo <Tao.Guo@emc.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Peter Feuerer [Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:51:36 +0000 (08:51 +1000)]
acerhdf: lowered default temp fanon/fanoff values
Due to new supported hardware, of which the actual temperature limits of
processor, harddisk and other components are unknown, it feels safer with
lower fanon / fanoff settings.
It won't change much for most people, already using acerhdf, as they use
their own fanon/fanoff variable settings when loading the module.
Furthermore seems like kernel and userspace tools have been improved to
work more efficient and netbooks don't get so hot anymore.
Signed-off-by: Peter Feuerer <peter@piie.net> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
projects / karo-tx-linux.git / log