]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/log
karo-tx-linux.git
9 years agogreybus: drop gfp_mask from gb_message_send()
Alex Elder [Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:53:10 +0000 (07:53 -0600)]
greybus: drop gfp_mask from gb_message_send()

We will only send messages from process context.  Drop the gfp_mask
parameter from gb_message_send(), and just supply GFP_KERNEL to the
host driver's buffer_send method.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: renumber operation result values
Alex Elder [Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:53:09 +0000 (07:53 -0600)]
greybus: renumber operation result values

Define a new operation status GB_OP_MALFUNCTION, which will be used
to represent that something unexpected happened while handling an
operation.  This is intended as an indication similar to a BUG()
call--whatever went wrong should *never* happen and because it's
unexpected we need to treat it as a fatal error.

Define another new operation status GB_OP_UNKNOWN_ERROR, which
will represent the case where an operation ended in error, but
the error was not recognized to be properly represented by one
of the other status values.

Renumber the operation status values, defining those that are
produced by core operations code ahead of those that are more
likely to come from operation handlers.  Represent the values in
hexadecimal to emphasize that they must be represented with 8 bits.
The Use 0xff for GB_OP_MALFUNCTION instead of GB_OP_TIMEOUT; the
latter is special, but a malfunction is in a class by itself.

Reorder the cases in gb_operation_status_map() to match their
numeric order.

Map GB_OP_UNKNOWN_ERROR to -EIO in gb_operation_status_map().  Map
GB_OP_MALFUNCTION to -EILSEQ in gb_operation_status_map(), since
that value is used to represent an implementation error.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: define -EILSEQ to mean implementation error
Alex Elder [Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:53:08 +0000 (07:53 -0600)]
greybus: define -EILSEQ to mean implementation error

Reserve operation result code -EILSEQ to represent that the code
that implements an operation is broken.  This is used (initially)
for any attempt to set the result to -EBADR (which is reserved for
an operation in initial state), or for an attempt to set the result
of an operation that is *not* in initial state to -EINPROGRESS.

Note that we still use -EIO gb_operation_status_map() to represent a
gb_operation_result value that isn't recognized.

In gb_operation_result(), warn if operation->errno is -EBADR.  That
is another value that indicates the operation is not in a state
where it's valid to query an operation's result.

Update a bunch of comments above gb_operation_result_set() to
explain constraints on operation->errno.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: enforce max representable message size
Alex Elder [Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:53:07 +0000 (07:53 -0600)]
greybus: enforce max representable message size

We represent the size of a message using a 16-bit field.  It's
possible for a host driver to advertise a maximum message size
that's bigger than that.  If that happens, reduce the host device's
maximum buffer size to the maximum we can represent the first time
a message is allocated.

This information is actually only used by the Greybus code, but
because we're modifying a value that's "owned" by the host driver,
issue a warning when this limit is being imposed

Ensure (at build time) that our own definition is sane as well.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: use outgoing flag when creating operation
Alex Elder [Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:53:06 +0000 (07:53 -0600)]
greybus: use outgoing flag when creating operation

In gb_operation_create_common(), a zero response size is still
being used to determine whether to use GFP_KERNEL or GFP_ATOMIC
when allocating a message.  Use the value of the "outgoing"
parameter to decide this instead.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: usb-gb: import a "buildable" version of the usb-gb.c driver
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:59:21 +0000 (16:59 -0800)]
greybus: usb-gb: import a "buildable" version of the usb-gb.c driver

Based on Fabien's original driver, this version is converted (mostly) to
the new greybus operation apis.  Lots of things still to do, not the
least being hooking up proper responses...

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: protect cookie with a mutex
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:54:04 +0000 (16:54 -0600)]
greybus: protect cookie with a mutex

When a Greybus message is sent, the host driver supplies a cookie
for Greybus to use to identify the sent message in the event it
needs to be canceled.  The cookie will be non-null while the message
is in flight, and a null pointer otherwise.

There are two problems with this, which arise out of the fact that a
message can be canceled at any time--even concurrent with it getting
sent (such as when Greybus is getting shut down).

First, the host driver's buffer_send method can return an error
value, which is non-null but not a valid cookie.  So we need to
ensure such a bogus cookie is never used to cancel a message.

Second, we can't resolve that problem by assigning message->cookie
only after we've determined it's not an error.  The instant
buffer_send() returns, the message may well be in flight and *should*
be canceled at shutdown, so we need the cookie value to reflect
that.

In order to avoid these problems, protect access to a message's
cookie value with a mutex.  A spin lock can't be used because the
window that needs protecting covers code that can block.  We
reset the cookie value to NULL as soon as the host driver has
notified us it has been sent (or failed to).

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: ignore a null cookie when canceling buffer
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:54:03 +0000 (16:54 -0600)]
greybus: ignore a null cookie when canceling buffer

It's possible for an in-flight buffer to be recorded as sent *after*
a thread has begin the process of canceling it.  In that case the
Greybus message cookie will be set to NULL, and that value can end
up getting passed to buffer_cancel().  Change buffer_cancel() so
it properly handles (ignores) a null cookie pointer.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: update operation result atomically
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:54:02 +0000 (16:54 -0600)]
greybus: update operation result atomically

An operation result can be set both in and out of interrupt context.
For example, a response message could be arriving at the same time a
timeout of the operation is getting processed.  We therefore need to
ensure the result is accessed atomically.

Protect updates to the errno field using the operations spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: enforce receive buffer size
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:06:45 +0000 (13:06 -0600)]
greybus: enforce receive buffer size

When an operation is created its receive buffer size is specified.
In all current cases, the size supplied for the receive buffer is
exactly the size that should be returned.  In other words, if
any fewer than that many bytes arrived in a response, it would be
an error.

So tighten the check on the number of bytes arriving for a response
message, ensuring that the number of bytes received is *exactly the
same* as the number of bytes available (rather than just less than).
We'll expand our interpretation of of -EMSGSIZE to mean "wrong
message size" rather than just "message too long."

If we someday encounter an actual case where we want to be able to
successfully receive something less than the full receive buffer we
can adjust the code to handle that (and give it a way to tell the
receiver how many bytes are present).

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: fix some error codes
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:06:44 +0000 (13:06 -0600)]
greybus: fix some error codes

Change the message result values used in two cases.

First, use -EMSGSIZE rather than -E2BIG to represent a message
that is larger than the buffer intended to hold it.  That is
the proper code for this situation.

Second, use -ECANCELED rather than -EINTR for an operation that
has been canceled.  The definition of that error is literally
"Operation Canceled" so it seems like the right thing to do.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: use special operation result valus
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:33:15 +0000 (11:33 -0600)]
greybus: use special operation result valus

This is more or less re-implementing this commit:
    96f95d4 greybus: update gbuf status for completion handlers
But this time we're doing this for an operation, not the gbuf.

Define an initial operation result value (-EBADR) to signify that no
valid result has been set.  Nobody should ever set that value after
the operation is initially created.  Since only the operation core
code sets the result, an attempt to set -EBADR would be a bug.

Define another known operation result value (-EINPROGRESS) for an
outgoing operation whose request has been sent but whose response
has not yet been successfully received.  This should the first
(non-initial) result value set, and it should happen exactly once.
Any other attempt to set this value once set would be a bug.

Finally, once the request message is in flight, the result value
will be set exactly once more, to indicate the final result of
the operation.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: first operation error prevails
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:33:14 +0000 (11:33 -0600)]
greybus: first operation error prevails

If an operation already has an error result recorded, don't
overwrite it with a new error code.

In order to ensure a request completes exactly once, return a
Boolean indicating whether setting the result was successful.  If
two threads are racing to complete an operation (for example if a
slow-but-normal response message arrives at the same time timeout
processing commences) only the one that sets the final result
will finish its activity.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: encapsulate operation result access
Alex Elder [Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:33:13 +0000 (11:33 -0600)]
greybus: encapsulate operation result access

Hide the setting and getting of the operation result (stored in
operation->errno) behind a pair of accessor functions.  Only the
operation core should be setting the result, but operations that
complete asynchronously will need access to the result so expose
the function that provides that.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: uart-gb: clean up send_line_coding
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:52:25 +0000 (13:52 -0800)]
greybus: uart-gb: clean up send_line_coding

We always pass the same option to send_line_coding() for the line_coding
structure, which is already in the struct gb_tty variable, so just
remove the second parameter as it's not needed.

This logic came from the cdc-acm.c driver, where it's also not needed
anymore, I'll go fix up that later on when I get a chance.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: es1-ap-usb: don't use 'es1' after it is freed
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:55:24 +0000 (09:25 +0530)]
greybus: es1-ap-usb: don't use 'es1' after it is freed

greybus_remove_hd() will free memory allocated to 'es1' and so using it after
the routine has returned isn't right.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: pwm-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:45:24 +0000 (17:45 -0800)]
greybus: pwm-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync

This converts the PWM protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync, removing
lots of places where the create/send/destroy pattern was being used to
send greybus messages.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: i2c-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:45:23 +0000 (17:45 -0800)]
greybus: i2c-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync

This converts the I2C protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync, removing
lots of places where the create/send/destroy pattern was being used to
send greybus messages.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: gpio-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:45:22 +0000 (17:45 -0800)]
greybus: gpio-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync

This converts the GPIO protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync,
removing lots of places where the create/send/destroy pattern was being
used to send greybus messages.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: uart-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:45:21 +0000 (17:45 -0800)]
greybus: uart-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync

This converts the UART protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync,
removing lots of places where the create/send/destroy pattern was being
used to send greybus messages.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: vibrator-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:45:20 +0000 (17:45 -0800)]
greybus: vibrator-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync

This converts the vibrator protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync,
removing the hand-rolled version of the same function, as well as
removing an open-coded version for a request when turning on the
vibrator motor.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: battery-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:45:19 +0000 (17:45 -0800)]
greybus: battery-gb: convert to use gb_operation_sync

This converts the battery protocol driver to use gb_operation_sync,
removing the hand-rolled version of the same function.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: operation: create gb_operation_sync for sending "simple" messages
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:19:13 +0000 (11:19 -0800)]
greybus: operation: create gb_operation_sync for sending "simple" messages

Everyone keeps doing the same create/send/destroy logic all over the
place, so abstract that out to a simple function that can handle any
arbritrary request and/or response.  This will let us save lots of
duplicated logic in the protocol drivers.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: rework synchronous operation completion
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:20 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: rework synchronous operation completion

The only time we need a completion signaled on a request is when the
request provided no callback function.  In that case, we wait for
a completion on behalf of the caller.

If an interrupt occurs, we attempt to cancel the message that's
been sent, but we don't actually complete the operation as required.

Instead of simply waiting for the completion, put in place a
special callback function for the synchronous operation.  The
only job the callback has is to signal completion, allowing the
waiter to know it's done.

This means gb_operation_complete() will always have a non-null
callback pointer, so it becomes a simple wrapper, and we can get rid
of it and invoke the callback directly, in gb_operation_work().

Be defensive by checking for a null callback pointer, and reset
it to NULL once it's been called.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: kill gb_operation_wait()
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:19 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: kill gb_operation_wait()

When a caller wants an operation to complete synchronously, there is
generally no need for any other threads to wait for the operation's
completion.  So here's no need for gb_operation_wait() to be
available for synchronous requests.  At the moment, all operations
are done synchronously.

Knowing that, get rid of the public gb_operation_wait() function,
and open-code it in gb_operation_request_send().  The public wait
function can be re-implemented when it's really needed.

With that function gone, the only waiter for the completion of an
operation is the submitter itself, and only then if it's
synchronous.  So rather than complete_all(), we can simply use
complete() to signal the submitter.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: cancel whole operation on interrupt
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:18 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: cancel whole operation on interrupt

Cancel the operation--not just the request message--if waiting
for a synchronous operation to complete is interrupted.  Return
the operation result (which in that case will be -EINTR).  The
cancelation will result in the normal operation completion path
being taken before returning.

Make gb_operation_wait() private, since it's only ever used for
for synchronous operations.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: cancel operation on timeout
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:17 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: cancel operation on timeout

If an operation times out, we need to cancel whatever message it
has in-flight.  Do that instead of completing the operation, in the
timeout handler.  When the in-flight request message is canceled its
completion function will lead to the proper completion of the
operation.

Change gb_operation_cancel() so it takes the errno that it's
supposed to assign as the result of the operation.

Note that we want to preserve the original -ETIMEDOUT error, so
don't overwrite the operation result value if it has already been
set.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: minor tweak in gb_connection_recv_response()
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:16 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: minor tweak in gb_connection_recv_response()

Any time we queue work on the operation work queue we need to have
set the operation errno first.

This patch moves the assignment of that field to be immediately
prior to the queue_work() call in gb_connection_recv_response(),
so it is easier to see at a glance that this has been done.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: add a reference to pending operations
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:15 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: add a reference to pending operations

Grab an extra reference to an operation before sending it.  Drop
that reference at the end of its completion handling.

It turns out gb_operation_get() got deleted along the way, so this
re-introduces it.  We're assuming we only get a reference when
there's at least one in existence so we don't need a semaphore to
protect it.  Emphasize this by *not* returning a pointer to
the referenced operation.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: handle data send errors in workqueue
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:14 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: handle data send errors in workqueue

The data sent callback can execute in atomic context.  If an error
occurred, we shouldn't be completing the operation right then and
there.  Instead, hand it off to the operation workqueue to complete
the operation.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: abandon incoming requests for now
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:13 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: abandon incoming requests for now

Change the operation "receive workqueue" to be just the operation
"workqueue".  All it does is complete an operation in non-atomic
context.  This is all that's required for an outgoing request.

Similarly, ignore any notion that a response will only exist
for outgoing requests in gb_operation_cancel().

I'm doing this in the interest of getting the outgoing request path
verified without the encumbrance of any preconceptions about how
incoming requests need to work.  When I finally turn my full
attenion to incoming requests I'll adapt the code as needed.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: use errno for operation result
Alex Elder [Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:29:12 +0000 (19:29 -0600)]
greybus: use errno for operation result

An in-core operation structure tracks the progress of an operation.
Currently it holds a result field that was intended to take the
status value that arrives in an operation response message header.

But operations can fail for reasons other than that, and it's
inconvenient to try to represent those using the operation status
codes.

So change the operation->result field to be an int, and switch to
storing negative errno values in it.  Rename it "errno" to make
it obvious how to interpret the value.

This patch makes another change, which simplifies the protocol drivers
a lot.  It's being done as part of this patch because it affects all
the same code as the above change does.  If desired I can split this
into two separate patches.

If a caller makes a synchronous gb_operation_request_send() request
(i.e., no callback function is supplied), and the operation request
and response messages were transferred successfully, have
gb_operation_request_send() return the result of the request (i.e.,
operation->errno).  This allows the caller (or more generally, any
caller of gb_request_wait() to avoid having to look at this field
for every successful send.

Any caller that does an asynchronous request will of course need
to look at request->errno in the callback function to see the
result of the operation.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: Random spell fixes
Viresh Kumar [Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:56:30 +0000 (11:26 +0530)]
greybus: Random spell fixes

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: rename greybus_cport_in()
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:09:18 +0000 (16:09 -0600)]
greybus: rename greybus_cport_in()

This function is associated with a host device (interface), not a
CPort.  Change its name to reflect that, and to match its "sent"
callback counterpart.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: define greybus_data_sent()
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:09:17 +0000 (16:09 -0600)]
greybus: define greybus_data_sent()

Define greybus_data_sent(), which is a callback the host driver
makes when a buffer send request has completed.  The main use for
this is to actively detect errors that can occur while sending.
(Something like this existed at one time and was removed.)

This also defines gb_hd_message_find(), which looks up a message
pointer associated with a buffer sent over a given host device.
This is now a pretty trival mapping.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: embed message buffer into message structure
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:09:16 +0000 (16:09 -0600)]
greybus: embed message buffer into message structure

Embed the buffer for message data into the message structure itself.
This allows us to use a single allocation for each message, and
more importantly will allow us to derive the message structure
describing a message from the buffer itself.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: dynamically allocate requests and responses
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:09:15 +0000 (16:09 -0600)]
greybus: dynamically allocate requests and responses

Have an operation's request and response messages be dynamically
allocated rather than embedded in an operation.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: rename message buffer fields
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:09:14 +0000 (16:09 -0600)]
greybus: rename message buffer fields

The beginning of an operation message always contains the message
header.  Rename the "buffer" field in an operation message to
be "header" to reflect this.  Change its type as well.

The size of a message is the combined size of its header and its
payload.  Rename the "buffer_size" field in a message header to
be simply "size", so message->size describes exactly that.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: have greybus allocate its own buffers
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:09:13 +0000 (16:09 -0600)]
greybus: have greybus allocate its own buffers

Rather than having the host driver allocate the buffers that the
Greybus core uses to hold its data for sending or receiving, have
the host driver define what it requires those buffers to look like.

Two constraints define what the host driver requires: the maximum
number of bytes that the host device can send in a single request;
and a statement of the "headroom" that needs to be present for
use by the host device.

The direct description of the headroom is that it's the extra byte
the host device needs at the beginning of the "data" portion of
the buffer so the ES1 driver can insert the destination CPort id.
But more generally, the host driver could put other data in there
as well.

By stating these two parameters, Greybus can allocate the buffers it
uses by itself.  The host driver still allocates the buffers it uses
for receiving data--the content of those are copied as needed into
Greybus buffers when data arrives.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: complete overflow responses
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:37:07 +0000 (15:37 -0600)]
greybus: complete overflow responses

If a response arrives for an operation request and the allotted
buffer isn't big enough we report the error, but we don't finish
processing the response.

Instead, set the operation result, but then finish processing
the response (no different from any other operation error).

This will allow the normal completion handling to occur for
this error case.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: fix a timeout race
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:37:06 +0000 (15:37 -0600)]
greybus: fix a timeout race

Whenever we send a request message we start a timer to ensure the
we don't wait too long for the matching response to arrive.
Currently we set up the timeout *after* sending the message, but
that is subject to a race--the response could arrive (and the
timeout prematurely disabled) before the timeout is even set up.

Set up the timeout before sending the message.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: drop a now-empty structure
Alex Elder [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:37:05 +0000 (15:37 -0600)]
greybus: drop a now-empty structure

One structure, gb_gpio_activate_response, was not deleted even
though it now has no contents.  Delete it.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: add -Wall to the build flags
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:09:53 +0000 (19:09 -0800)]
greybus: add -Wall to the build flags

In an attempt to turn on as many options as we can to catch warnings
early, let's enable -Wall.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
9 years agogreybus: pwm-gb.c: fix up missing { } for else
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:02:21 +0000 (17:02 -0800)]
greybus: pwm-gb.c: fix up missing { } for else

This was a compiler warning, which looked correct, but was trying to
tell us something else...

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: uart-gb: fix up typo from previous patch moving the status variable around.
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:56:13 +0000 (16:56 -0800)]
greybus: uart-gb: fix up typo from previous patch moving the status variable around.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: remove status from all responses
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:55:05 +0000 (17:55 -0600)]
greybus: remove status from all responses

This is a pervasive change, but not really a big one.  However:

        ==============  Pay attention to this ==============
If you're doing any testing with "gbsim" you need to
update that program in sync with this change, because
it changes the protocol used between them.
        ==============  Pay attention to this ==============

The status of a request is now recorded in the header of a response
message.  The previous patch put that header status byte in place,
and this one removes the status byte from all the response
messages.

And finally, since we're modifying all these files anyway...
Use gb_operation_status_map() to come up with a return code
to use, given an operation response.  Right now most errors
simply result in -EIO getting returned.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: define gb_operation_status_map()
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:55:04 +0000 (17:55 -0600)]
greybus: define gb_operation_status_map()

Define a common function that maps an operation status value to a
Linux negative errno.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: send operation result in response message header
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:55:03 +0000 (17:55 -0600)]
greybus: send operation result in response message header

Define a result byte in an operation response message header.

All the protocols now define the mandatory status as the first
byte in their response message.  Assume that, for the moment,
and save that value into the header result field (until we can
get the simulator set up to handle the new protocol).

Record the result from the response header as the result of the
overall operation.

Start enforcing the rule that we ignore all response payload (in
fact, the entire message) if we see a non-zero result value.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: distinguish incoming from outgoing requests
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:55:02 +0000 (17:55 -0600)]
greybus: distinguish incoming from outgoing requests

When we remove the mandatory status byte from response messages we
will no longer be able to use a zero-sized response to indicate
an operation is to be used for an incoming request.

Define a new function gb_operation_create_incoming() to be used
for incoming operations.  Change (and rename) gb_operation_create()
to be a helper that takes a Boolean to indicate which type is to be
created, and use a simple wrapper to expose the outgoing operation
creation routine.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: get rid of uart request_operation()
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:55:01 +0000 (17:55 -0600)]
greybus: get rid of uart request_operation()

In "uart-gb.c", request_operation() function is only used by
get_version().  Since it's not reused, it probably subtracts
rather than adds value.  So just incorporate what it does
into get_version() and get rid of request_operation().

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: uart-gb: handle throttle/unthrottle properly
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:23:00 +0000 (14:23 -0800)]
greybus: uart-gb: handle throttle/unthrottle properly

This hooks up throttle/unthrottle to properly toggle the RTS line or do
XON/XOFF if that is how the port is set up.

Note, if the UART itself can handle XON/XOFF, we would need to send the
correct character down to it, to have the firmware in the device set up
the chip to use it automatically when needed.  The odds of someone
wanting to use this type of flow control is slim, so this isn't
implemented at this point in time.

Also fill in a few more fields in the get_serial_info ioctl, to make
tools like stty(1) happier.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: fix vibrator request_operation()
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:05:14 +0000 (17:05 -0600)]
greybus: fix vibrator request_operation()

And this fixes a problem similar the last two, this time found in
the vibrator protcool driver code.

Change a variable name in get_version() to reflect that it holds
a response message, not a request message.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: fix uart request_operation()
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:29:15 +0000 (16:29 -0600)]
greybus: fix uart request_operation()

This fixes a problem similar to what was found in the battery
protcool driver code.

There's no need to allocate a local buffer, that already set up
by gb_operation_create().  Just use that instead.

Change a few variable names to reflect that they hold response
messages, not request messages.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: fix battery_operation()
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:29:14 +0000 (16:29 -0600)]
greybus: fix battery_operation()

This patch fixes some problems with the battery protocol driver.

First, when gb_operation_create() is called, it creates buffers of
the requested sizes to hold the operation request and response
messages.  There is therefore no reason to allocate a local response
buffer.  By the time the (synchronous) gb_operation_request_send()
call returns, the operation response buffer will have been filled in.

(In addition, the content of local_response was not being filled
before its contents were used...)

Next, all the message structures are misnamed.  The structures that
are defined are all the content of operation response messages (not
request messages).  So this changes all the types names to properly
reflect their role.

All the local variables using these types are similarly renamed.

I added a new type, gb_generic_battery_response, to be used for
casting the fake_response used in battery_operation().

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: operation: don't complete operation twice
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:55:00 +0000 (17:25 +0530)]
greybus: operation: don't complete operation twice

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: refactor gb_connection_recv()
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:27:17 +0000 (12:27 -0600)]
greybus: refactor gb_connection_recv()

Define two helper functions to break down handling of a received
message.  One is used to handle receiving an incoming request
message, the other for a response message.

Three other changes are made:
    - We verify message size recorded in the message header does not
      exceed the amount of data that's arriving.
    - We no longer warn if a request' recorded message size differs
      from the number of bytes that have arrived.
    - We now record the operation id for an incoming request.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: use "operation_id" for certain values
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:27:16 +0000 (12:27 -0600)]
greybus: use "operation_id" for certain values

A message header contains a field "id" that is an operation id.
Since the field doesn't identify the message itself, rename this
field so it's clearer what it's referring to.

Similarly gb_pending_operation_find() has a parameter "id" that
is really an operation id, so rename that as well.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: get rid of message status
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:27:15 +0000 (12:27 -0600)]
greybus: get rid of message status

We (sort of) maintain the status of each message, but we shouldn't
need to.  Right now we're not using it consistently in any case.

If a message fails to send, the caller will know to destroy the
operation that contained it.

If a message has been sent (i.e., handed to the host device layer)
it'll have a non-null cookie pointer.

If a does complete in error, we can update the status of the
operation that contains it.  That isn't happening right now but
it will soon.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: tidy up svc_in_callback() and cport_in_callback()
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:27:14 +0000 (12:27 -0600)]
greybus: tidy up svc_in_callback() and cport_in_callback()

The only use of local variable "es1" in in svc_in_callback() and
cport_in_callback() is to get at its hd field.  But we already have
that, so we can get rid of that local variable.

Also, rename the "cport" variable "cport_id" in cport_in_callback()
is to match the convention used elsewhere, and make it the proper
u16 type.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: explicitly mark cookies as opaque
Alex Elder [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:27:13 +0000 (12:27 -0600)]
greybus: explicitly mark cookies as opaque

Use simple macros to mark the conversion of an URB pointer into an
opaque cookie value (and vice-versa).  We scramble some bits, but
the main point is to make it explicit where we're returning and
using opaque values.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: ap: function_id is already set by svc_msg_alloc()
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:54:59 +0000 (17:24 +0530)]
greybus: ap: function_id is already set by svc_msg_alloc()

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: Pass '*ptr' to sizeof() wherever possible
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:54:58 +0000 (17:24 +0530)]
greybus: Pass '*ptr' to sizeof() wherever possible

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: ap: keep all svc function routines together
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:54:57 +0000 (17:24 +0530)]
greybus: ap: keep all svc function routines together

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: ap: remove extra parameter to convert_ap_message()
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:54:56 +0000 (17:24 +0530)]
greybus: ap: remove extra parameter to convert_ap_message()

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: vibrator-gb.c: fix up incorrect comment
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:36:23 +0000 (10:36 -0800)]
greybus: vibrator-gb.c: fix up incorrect comment

s/i2c/vibrator/

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: Merge branch 'master' into vibrator-gb
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:54:35 +0000 (12:54 -0800)]
greybus: Merge branch 'master' into vibrator-gb

9 years agogreybus: pass gfp_flags for message allocation
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:54 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: pass gfp_flags for message allocation

The only reason gb_operation_message_init() gets its "outbound"
argument is so we can determine what allocation flags to use.
Just pass the flags in directly instead.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: stop storing dest_cport_id in message
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:53 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: stop storing dest_cport_id in message

We can derive the destination CPort id of any (outbound) message
from the connection it's operation is associated with.  So we don't
need to store that information in every message.

As a result, we no longer need to record it at message initialization
time.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: stop storing hd in message
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:52 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: stop storing hd in message

The host device pointer doesn't have to be stored in every message.
It can be derived by following up the chain of pointers back to
the operation's connection.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: kill the last gbuf remnants
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:51 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: kill the last gbuf remnants

All the code has now been adjusted such that we can do away with the
old gbuf structure.

Three unused references remained in "greybus.h", so those are deleted.

Other than that most of the changes were done by simple global
substitution.  The gb_message structure incorporates the fields that
were previously found its embedded gbuf structure.  A few names have
been changed in the process:
    gbuf->transfer_buffer       message->buffer
    gbuf->transfer_buffer_size  message->buffer_size
    gbuf->hcd_data;             message->cookie

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: rework receve handling
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:50 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: rework receve handling

Rework gb_connection_operation_recv() to be more oriented toward an
operation message, and to no longer use a struct gbuf local variable.
Rename it to be a little more wieldy.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: cancel messages, not gbufs
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:49 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: cancel messages, not gbufs

Rework greybus_kill_gbuf() to be oriented toward an operation
message rather than a gbuf, and rename it.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: send messages, not gbufs
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:48 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: send messages, not gbufs

Rework greybus_submit_gbuf() to be oriented toward an operation
message rather than a gbuf, and rename it accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: rework message initialization
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:47 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: rework message initialization

Rework gb_opreation_message_init() so it doesn't use a struct gbuf
local variable.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: send buffers without gbufs
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:46 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: send buffers without gbufs

Change the method that sends messages so that it sends "raw" buffers
rather than gbufs.  To do this, we supply the host device and
destination CPort when sending.  As with other recent patches,
change the name of the method to reflect that we're no longer
dealing with gbufs.

The interface has changed as well.  Now this routine will return a
"cookie" value.  The cookie is used to represent the outgoing
request, and is supplied by the caller if necessary to cancel a
previously-sent buffer.  We'll store the result in gbuf->hcd_data
for now (which produces the same result as before...).

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: stash hd as context for all URBs
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:45 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: stash hd as context for all URBs

This changes the context value stashed with each USB URB so that it
is always the host device pointer.

In cport_out_callback() this allows us to get away with *not*
requiring the gbuf for handling completions any more.  We are
(currently) ignoring the gbuf status value returned anyway, so
we'll skip setting it altogether.

Greg's comments in cport_out_callback() point out that ignoring
this was misguided, and handling send errors will be put in
place in an upcoming patch.

The context is set to the host device pointer for SVC receive and
CPort receive URBs for consistency--because we can.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: cancel buffers via magic cookie
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:44 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: cancel buffers via magic cookie

Change the interface for canceling in-flight buffers to take a magic
cookie value as argument rather than a gbuf.  Right now we pass the
gbuf->hcd_data pointer that's assumed to have been set by the submit
routine.  But the next patch will change the submit routine to
return the cookie to be used, and the caller will be responsible for
keeping track of it.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: free space without gbufs
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:43 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: free space without gbufs

Switch the host driver free routine to take a pointer to the
previously-allocated buffer that should be freed.

Rename the method to reflect it's no longer tied to a gbuf.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: allocate space without gbufs
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:42 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: allocate space without gbufs

This begins the transition to buffer allocation that does not rely
on the gbuf construct.

The host driver allocation routine will return a pointer to the
buffer to be used, and the caller will be responsible for keeping
track of that pointer, as well as the requested buffer size.

Rename the allocation method to reflect it's no longer tied to a
gbuf.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: fill in destination data at send time
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:41 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: fill in destination data at send time

For ES1 we need to insert the destination CPort id before the data
to be sent over UniPro.  Currently this is done at the time the
buffer is created, but there's no need to do so until we're actually
going to send the content of the buffer.

Move the setting of that destination information into submit_gbuf().
Note that this allows us to defer initializing a few other gbuf
fields until after we know the buffer allocation has succeeded.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: improve data buffer alignment
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:40 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: improve data buffer alignment

For ES1 we need to insert the destination CPort id in whatever we
supply for sending over UniPro.  Currently we allocate one extra
byte supply the caller with an address that's offset by one from
the beginning of the allocated space.

As a result we always return a poorly-aligned buffer pointer.

Instead, allocate enough space so that we can return a better
aligned buffer to the caller.

Notes:
    - It may be that it's more important to supply an aligned
      address to the hardware.
    - We probably need to be more careful about writing into
      these buffers at unaligned offsets anyway.  (E.g., writing
      a 2-byte value at an odd offset can't be assumed to work.)

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: prepend cport byte for all gbufs
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:39 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: prepend cport byte for all gbufs

Treat communication buffers for both inbound and outbound data the
same way, prepending a "destination cport id" byte before the data
in the buffer.  Currently this is done only for outbound data
buffers.

This isn't needed for inbound data, but handling it this way
allows the free routine to work without knowing whether the
buffer was used for sending or receiving.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: fix an allocation flag bug
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:26:38 +0000 (13:26 -0600)]
greybus: fix an allocation flag bug

We allocate message buffers with GFP_KERNEL allocation flags if
possible.  However when an incoming request message is received we
can be in interrupt context, so we must use GFP_ATOMIC in that case.

The computation of gfp_flags in gb_operation_message_init() is
wrong.  It is needlessly using GFP_ATOMIC when allocating outbound
response buffers.  Fix the flawed logic.

Change the name of "data_out" to be "outbound" to be consistent with
usage elsewhere.  (Data/messages are "inbound" or "outbound";
requests are "incoming" or "outgoing".)

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: vibrator-gb: fix up api changes
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:21:27 +0000 (12:21 -0800)]
greybus: vibrator-gb: fix up api changes

responses changed in 'master' so fix up things so that the vibrator
driver works properly.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: Merge branch 'master' into vibrator-gb
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:18:35 +0000 (12:18 -0800)]
greybus: Merge branch 'master' into vibrator-gb

9 years agogreybus: kill off the last of gbuf.c
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:37 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: kill off the last of gbuf.c

Only three functions remain in "gbuf.c".  Move one of them into
"connection.c" and the other two into "operation.c".

Some more cleanup is coming that will further straighten out gbufs
but for now there's no sense in drawing this out any longer.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: kill the gbuf slab cache
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:36 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: kill the gbuf slab cache

Nobody dynamically allocates gbufs any more, so we can get rid of
the allocation and free routines, as as the slab cache and its
related code.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: embed gbufs into operation message structure
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:35 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: embed gbufs into operation message structure

Embed the gbuf structures for operation messages into the message
structure rather than pointing to a dynamically allocated one.

Use a null gbuf->transfer_buffer pointer rather than a null gbuf
pointer to indicate an unused gbuf.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: use null gbuf->transfer_buffer
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:34 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: use null gbuf->transfer_buffer

Make sure gbuf->transfer_buffer gets reset to NULL when the buffer
is freed.  We can leverage that to do a little extra error checking.
We'll also use a null transfer buffer in the next patch to indicate
an unused gbuf.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: move gbuf initialization to caller
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:33 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: move gbuf initialization to caller

Change greybus_alloc_gbuf() so all it does is allocate the gbuf data
structure.  Move all of the initialization of the gbuf structure in
the caller.  Do the inverse in the caller prior to freeing the gbuf
structure via greybus_free_gbuf().  Use a null gbuf->transfer_buffer
pointer rather than a null gbuf pointer to indicate an unused gbuf.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: start using struct gb_message
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:32 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: start using struct gb_message

This converts some of the operation code to start leveraging the
new gb_message type.  Instead of creating the request and response
gbufs, we initialize (and tear down with a new function) the
request and response message structures.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: define struct gb_message
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:31 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: define struct gb_message

A Greybus buffer (gbuf) is a generic buffer used for data transfer
over a Greybus interconnect.  We only ever use gbufs in operations,
which always involve exactly two of them.  The lifetime of a gbuf is
therefore directly connected to the lifetime of an operation, so
there no real need to manage gbufs separate from operations.

This patch begins the process of removing the gbuf abstraction, on
favor of a new data type, gb_message.  The purpose of a gb_message
is--like a gbuf--to represent data to be transferred over Greybus.
However a gb_message is oriented toward the more restrictive way
we do Greybus transfers--as operation messages (either a request or
a response).

This patch simply defines the structure in its initial form, and
defines the request and response fields in a Greybus operation
structure as embedded instances of that type.  The gbuf pointer
is defined within the gb_message structure, and as a result lots
of code needs to be tweaked to reference the request and response
gbufs as subfields of the request and response structures.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: move the definition of struct gbuf
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:30 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: move the definition of struct gbuf

We no longer need struct gbuf defined in "greybus.h".  An upcoming
patch will embed a gbuf struct (not a pointer) into the operation
structure, and to do that we'll need the struct defined prior to the
operation.  Just move the gbuf definition into "operation.h".

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: kill gbuf->kref
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:29 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: kill gbuf->kref

Since there is only ever one reference to a gbuf, we don't need a
kref to figure out when it can be freed.  Get rid of the kref and
its supporting code.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: kill greybus_{get,put}_gbuf()
Alex Elder [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:08:28 +0000 (18:08 -0600)]
greybus: kill greybus_{get,put}_gbuf()

These functions are never used, so we can get rid of them.
Since there's no reference-getting function any more, we no
longer need "gbuf_mutex" to avoid racing gets and puts, so
get rid of that too.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: vibrator-gb: proper allocate minor numbers
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:12:50 +0000 (17:12 -0800)]
greybus: vibrator-gb: proper allocate minor numbers

Change the driver to allocate minors in a proper manner, using the idr
interface.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: vibrator-gb: fixes based on Marti's review comments.
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:55:54 +0000 (16:55 -0800)]
greybus: vibrator-gb: fixes based on Marti's review comments.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: vibrator-gb: add vibrator driver
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:03:34 +0000 (16:03 -0800)]
greybus: vibrator-gb: add vibrator driver

This driver implements the Greybus vibrator protocol, as defined in the
Greybus protocol specification.  It interacts to userspace with a single
sysfs file, "timeout", and a separate "class" called "vibrator".  That
interface can/should be changed in the future depending on what Android
wants for its HAL, but for now should be good enough to test with.

There are some changes needed to kernel_ver.h to support some
sysfs/driver core changes that happened after the 3.10 kernel was
released to try to make the code simpler.  Even with those changes,
there are #ifdefs in the code to do different things depending on the
kernel version to implement the same userspace api.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: greybus_manifest.h: update with full list of protocols
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:14 +0000 (15:19 -0800)]
greybus: greybus_manifest.h: update with full list of protocols

The protocol values had gotten out of sync with the Greybus Protocol
specification document, so bring them back into sync by changing a few
values, and adding the missing values.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
9 years agogreybus: uart: handle NULL size requests in request_operation()
Greg Kroah-Hartman [Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:15:34 +0000 (15:15 -0800)]
greybus: uart: handle NULL size requests in request_operation()

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>