Arnd Bergmann [Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:44:12 +0000 (17:44 +0100)]
thermal: allow u8500-thermal driver to be a module
When the thermal subsystem is a loadable module, the u8500 driver
fails to build:
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `db8500_thermal_probe':
db8500_thermal.c:(.text+0x96c): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_register'
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `db8500_thermal_work':
db8500_thermal.c:(.text+0xab4): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_update'
This changes the symbol to a tristate, so Kconfig can track the
dependency correctly.
Arnd Bergmann [Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:44:11 +0000 (17:44 +0100)]
thermal: allow spear-thermal driver to be a module
When the thermal subsystem is a loadable module, the spear driver
fails to build:
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `spear_thermal_exit':
spear_thermal.c:(.text+0xf8): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_unregister'
drivers/thermal/built-in.o: In function `spear_thermal_probe':
spear_thermal.c:(.text+0x230): undefined reference to `thermal_zone_device_register'
This changes the symbol to a tristate, so Kconfig can track the
dependency correctly.
Arnd Bergmann [Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:44:10 +0000 (17:44 +0100)]
thermal: spear: use __maybe_unused for PM functions
The spear thermal driver hides its suspend/resume function conditionally
based on CONFIG_PM, but references them based on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, so
we get a warning if the former is set but the latter is not:
thermal/spear_thermal.c:58:12: warning: 'spear_thermal_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
thermal/spear_thermal.c:75:12: warning: 'spear_thermal_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
This removes the #ifdef and instead uses a __maybe_uninitialized
annotation to avoid the warning and improve compile-time coverage.
This patch enables to use thermal-zone on DT if it was calles as
"renesas,rcar-thermal-gen2".
Previous style (= non thermal-zone) is still supported by
"renesas,rcar-thermal" to keep compatibility for "git bisect".
* pm-cpufreq: (22 commits)
cpufreq: governor: Drop pointless goto from cpufreq_governor_init()
cpufreq: governor: Rename skip_work to work_count
cpufreq: governor: Symmetrize cpu_dbs_info initialization and cleanup
cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures
cpufreq: governor: Simplify cpufreq_governor_limits()
cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu()
cpufreq: governor: Rename cpu_common_dbs_info to policy_dbs_info
cpufreq: governor: Drop the gov pointer from struct dbs_data
cpufreq: governor: Rework cpufreq_governor_dbs()
cpufreq: governor: Rename some data types and variables
cpufreq: governor: Put governor structure into common_dbs_data
cpufreq: governor: Avoid passing dbs_data pointers around unnecessarily
cpufreq: governor: Use common mutex for dbs_data protection
cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
cpufreq: Add a mechanism for registering utilization update callbacks
cpufreq: powernv: Replace pr_info with trace print for throttle event
cpufreq: powernv/tracing: Add powernv_throttle tracepoint
cpufreq: powernv: Remove cpu_to_chip_id() from hot-path
cpufreq: powernv: Hot-plug safe the kworker thread
...
cpufreq: governor: Symmetrize cpu_dbs_info initialization and cleanup
Make the initialization of struct cpu_dbs_info objects in
alloc_policy_dbs_info() and the code that cleans them up in
free_policy_dbs_info() more symmetrical. In particular,
set/clear the update_util.func field in those functions along
with the policy_dbs field.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures
The struct policy_dbs_info objects representing per-policy governor
data are not accessible directly from the corresponding policy
objects. To access them, one has to get a pointer to the
struct cpu_dbs_info of policy->cpu and use the policy_dbs field of
that which isn't really straightforward.
To address that rearrange the governor data structures so the
governor_data pointer in struct cpufreq_policy will point to
struct policy_dbs_info (instead of struct dbs_data) and that will
contain a pointer to struct dbs_data.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Use the observation that cpufreq_governor_limits() doesn't have to
get to the policy object it wants to manipulate by walking the
reference chain cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, as the final pointer is
actually equal to its argument, and make it access the policy
object directy via its argument.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu()
Since policy->cpu is always passed as the second argument to
dbs_check_cpu(), it is not really necessary to pass it, because
the function can obtain that value via its first argument just fine.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Rename cpu_common_dbs_info to policy_dbs_info
The struct cpu_common_dbs_info structure represents the per-policy
part of the governor data (for the ondemand and conservative
governors), but its name doesn't reflect its purpose.
Rename it to struct policy_dbs_info and rename variables related to
it accordingly.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Drop the gov pointer from struct dbs_data
Since it is possible to obtain a pointer to struct dbs_governor
from a pointer to the struct governor embedded in it with the help
of container_of(), the additional gov pointer in struct dbs_data
isn't really necessary.
Drop that pointer and make the code using it reach the dbs_governor
object via policy->governor.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Since it is possible to obtain a pointer to struct dbs_governor
from a pointer to the struct governor embedded in it via
container_of(), the second argument of cpufreq_governor_init()
is not necessary. Accordingly, cpufreq_governor_dbs() doesn't
need its second argument either and the ->governor callbacks
for both the ondemand and conservative governors may be set
to cpufreq_governor_dbs() directly. Make that happen.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Rename some data types and variables
The ondemand and conservative governors are represented by
struct common_dbs_data whose name doesn't reflect the purpose it
is used for, so rename it to struct dbs_governor and rename
variables of that type accordingly.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Put governor structure into common_dbs_data
For the ondemand and conservative governors (generally, governors
that use the common code in cpufreq_governor.c), there are two static
data structures representing the governor, the struct governor
structure (the interface to the cpufreq core) and the struct
common_dbs_data one (the interface to the cpufreq_governor.c code).
There's no fundamental reason why those two structures have to be
separate. Moreover, if the struct governor one is included into
struct common_dbs_data, it will be possible to reach the latter from
the policy via its policy->governor pointer, so it won't be necessary
to pass a separate pointer to it around. For this reason, embed
struct governor in struct common_dbs_data.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Avoid passing dbs_data pointers around unnecessarily
Do not pass struct dbs_data pointers to the family of functions
implementing governor operations in cpufreq_governor.c as they can
take that pointer from policy->governor by themselves.
The cpufreq_governor_init() case is slightly more complicated, since
policy->governor may be NULL when it is invoked, but then it can reach
the pointer in question via its cdata argument just fine.
While at it, rework cpufreq_governor_dbs() to avoid a pointless
policy_governor check in the CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT case.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Use common mutex for dbs_data protection
Every governor relying on the common code in cpufreq_governor.c
has to provide its own mutex in struct common_dbs_data. However,
there actually is no need to have a separate mutex per governor
for this purpose, they may be using the same global mutex just
fine. Accordingly, introduce a single common mutex for that and
drop the mutex field from struct common_dbs_data.
That at least will ensure that the mutex is always present and
initialized regardless of what the particular governors do.
Another benefit is that the common code does not need a pointer to
a governor-related structure to get to the mutex which sometimes
helps.
Finally, it makes the code generally easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
Instead of using a per-CPU deferrable timer for queuing up governor
work items, register a utilization update callback that will be
invoked from the scheduler on utilization changes.
The sampling rate is still the same as what was used for the
deferrable timers and the added irq_work overhead should be offset by
the eliminated timers overhead, so in theory the functional impact of
this patch should not be significant.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
projects / karo-tx-linux.git / log